slugger, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do the same for hands where you were
1) >70% leader and won
2) <30% underdog and sucked out
3) <30% underdog and lost

yah that would really determine whether your playing good/running bad, or playing meh/running bad etc, etc.

not making any judgements, but ev graphs have a lot of grey area imo.



tbh, even if you did this, it still wouldn't include the time you have been coolered/coolered people and running bad in 3bet pots/bluff spots.
if you went through extensive research and tried to include all these things it would probably give you a much better idea to how exactly how bad/(good lol) you are running.


tbn^2 all of this would probably be -ev and a huge waste of time.


gl at running better

my god that was painful to watch...i don't know how you are still playing. good luck to you.

That video is imo the best horror movie I have ever watched. Gut wrenching and really scary.

IS THIS WHOLE THREAD FOR REAL? I MEAN I RUN BAD... I GO PLAY LIVE FOR A WEEK. OR I CHANGE SITES OR I CHANGE FROM SNGS TO CASH OR SOMETHING...

dude its broken you cant fix it. try something else, rinse, repeat.

take a break and then try something else.

use a friends account or something; im sure your psychologically ****ed at this point and this thread isnt helping.

He only loses a 70/30 every 2400 hands...he runs like god.

I did "<30% underdog and sucked out" and found that I sucked out 96 times! Still 40 times less than when I was sucked out on though.

What if I set the all in win% at 50% and see how many pots I win/lose + and - 50%??

Another important question: why have you still monies to play with?

Ok, I broke down the variance in 4 ways using the HEM filter:

Got all-in 50%+ favorite and won:
http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/l...n50wonhand.jpg

Got all-in 50%+ favorite and lost:
http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/l...g/89e82fc2.jpg

Got all-in 50%- underdog and won:
http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/l...g/dcba959b.jpg

Got all-in 50$- underdog and lost:
http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/l...g/534b650a.jpg


So for all-in pots it looks like:

I got my money in ahead and won 1,528 hands and won $88,678.90

I got my money in ahead and lost 483 hands and lost -$24,158.40

I got my money in behind and won 323 hands and won $18,411.65

I got my money in behind and lost 1,354 hands and lost -$87,716.75

Got my money in ahead 2,011 times for +$64,520
Got my money in behind 1,677 times for -$69,305

Sucked out on: 483 times
Sucked out: 323 times

The numbers at the last don't decide how lucky/unlucky you were, they should be ratio's of the total numbers. Also, you might be getting it in ahead with a lower % win chance & getting it in behind with a higher % win chance. Or whatever. But that's what PokerEV's for. Numbers like these are retarded, since they're not meaningful at all. Asymmetrical distributions

UNINSTALL THE CANCER!!!!

Consider yourself the unluckiest man on the face of the earth.

imo

lol at Lou Gehrig post

lmao. I love Lou Gehrig.

wait, you quit?