Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Limit Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes Limit

Notices

Medium Stakes Limit Discussions of medium stakes limit Texas Hold'em

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-01-2012, 01:55 AM   #31
Yes, you barred
 
jesse8888's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 13,147
Re: Weird Spot with No Pair

Quote:
Originally Posted by gaming_mouse View Post
thread seems to be getting interesting. anyone want to provide some ranges for the other players and we can run some numbers?
At the turn donk point BB has a huge range. Many many unpaired overs, naked guts, naked one pairs, sets, 2 pairs (discount the monsters some). He doesn't have top pair or a pair and a gut or like 99 though. His chances of having a jack go down when he checks (I'd expect a donk).

The limper has a jack or a flush draw he both open limped and then peeled with almost always. He could have something like A4s I suppose also.

That help? My gut tells me if we call the turn we need to be willing to call a fair number of rivers UI.
jesse8888 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 06:01 AM   #32
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
gaming_mouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: taking notes on u (see profile)
Posts: 11,948
Re: Weird Spot with No Pair

how loose is limper peeling flop? and is he limping suited trash, or only like SCs and 1gappers? what's your guess at his lowest suited king? queen? jack?
gaming_mouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 11:21 AM   #33
Yes, you barred
 
jesse8888's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 13,147
Re: Weird Spot with No Pair

Quote:
Originally Posted by gaming_mouse View Post
how loose is limper peeling flop? and is he limping suited trash, or only like SCs and 1gappers? what's your guess at his lowest suited king? queen? jack?
On this board he folds nothing to the flop bet i bet (now that u mention it). No suited trash. K8s Q8s.
jesse8888 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 08:59 PM   #34
Yes, you barred
 
jesse8888's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 13,147
Re: Weird Spot with No Pair

Quote:
Originally Posted by La Peste View Post
I've brought my high WTSD to offline 9 max, and can report 1BB/hr over the last year+. You B&M players assume that since you have more live experience that you know something I do not. I certainly am not accusing anyone of thinking like I do or playing well. If a donk is irrational why are you trying to rationalize what he has? It is my humble opinion that most of you guys around here fold way way too much. You don't see people bluffing in spots like this because you don't call here and see the hand. We don't always have to be right here. We are, after all, getting 5.5:1 on the turn and get to see a river card.
In fairness a year plus for you is like what 50k hands? 75?
jesse8888 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 10:01 PM   #35
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
La Peste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,068
1500 hrs
La Peste is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2012, 11:16 PM   #36
Pooh-Bah
 
armor32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Verifying chips
Posts: 3,629
I can't stop thinking about this thread as I am partying a 40 session where I saw like 7 or 8 spots where turn donk meant draws and wierd stuff, but never strong made hand...
armor32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 01:02 AM   #37
Yes, you barred
 
jesse8888's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 13,147
Re: Weird Spot with No Pair

Quote:
Originally Posted by armor32 View Post
I can't stop thinking about this thread as I am partying a 40 session where I saw like 7 or 8 spots where turn donk meant draws and wierd stuff, but never strong made hand...
It depends on your definition of "strong" IMO.
jesse8888 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 01:15 AM   #38
Pooh-Bah
 
armor32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Verifying chips
Posts: 3,629
Re: Weird Spot with No Pair

Quote:
Originally Posted by jesse8888 View Post
It depends on your definition of "strong" IMO.
one that beats second pair ?

P.S. partying = playing... love typos that Samsung 'swype' generates. This time, 'partying' can be actually be a better wording than 'playing'
armor32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 11:38 PM   #39
Mr. Roper
 
sublime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: up in dat ass
Posts: 21,180
Re: Weird Spot with No Pair

player with lots of success:

Quote:
this is a supereasy turn fold imo.
player with lots of success:

Quote:
I already told Jesse I would never fold the turn.
other people:

Quote:
i dont see the debate?
gee, perhaps it is indeed close?

5 minutes of actually running some scenarios suggest this is indeed the case.

if we create a scenario in which the villain donks with this range:

Ac7c-Ac4c, QJs, JTs, KJo, QJo, JTo

we have about 15% equity vs this range. of course he could be playing a weird line with a set or with some weaker made hand.

this does of course ignore the LP player but its a simplistic baseline of our equity vs a quick range.

calling here and recording data seems to be the way to go. this is of course ignoring the possibility of raising being a superior play. the BB is folding one non-jack pair and i would venture to guess some jacks hit the muck on occasion. i dont know if raising is better, but its on the table.

i do indeed think this is close and while how you play this hand in this spot is probably not a big deal, how you approach situations similar to this might indeed be very important. dismissing a situation because 95% of the time in the past players of this description have a jack could be very problematic. the game is always evolving and the tide always rises. when it does everyone usually come along for the ride.
sublime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2012, 12:52 AM   #40
Chip Spewer
 
DcifrThs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Spewin them chips
Posts: 15,813
Re: Weird Spot with No Pair

Quote:
Originally Posted by sublime View Post
player with lots of success:



player with lots of success:



other people:



gee, perhaps it is indeed close?

5 minutes of actually running some scenarios suggest this is indeed the case.

if we create a scenario in which the villain donks with this range:

Ac7c-Ac4c, QJs, JTs, KJo, QJo, JTo

we have about 15% equity vs this range. of course he could be playing a weird line with a set or with some weaker made hand.

this does of course ignore the LP player but its a simplistic baseline of our equity vs a quick range.

calling here and recording data seems to be the way to go. this is of course ignoring the possibility of raising being a superior play. the BB is folding one non-jack pair and i would venture to guess some jacks hit the muck on occasion. i dont know if raising is better, but its on the table.

i do indeed think this is close and while how you play this hand in this spot is probably not a big deal, how you approach situations similar to this might indeed be very important. dismissing a situation because 95% of the time in the past players of this description have a jack could be very problematic. the game is always evolving and the tide always rises. when it does everyone usually come along for the ride.
good post, sublime.

this does appear closer than i first thought. in my experience, when a self taught player donks on a multiway turn it's almost always b/c the card helped him and most often it's a pair. esp if somebody in the hand has been known to k/c and not k/r frequently (as is the case here w/ a loose passive bb).

more knowledgeable players would donk the jack w/ other pairs or a club draw realizing the OP's pf raising range contains many more now unpaired aces than made hands and the bb can have a large k/c range (effectively increasing his equity when he would have check called again anyways).

my assumption was that the player was more like the 'straightforward not very knowledgeable self taught' player. the range here can vary greatly from player to player so in this spot, in general (and here specifically), i'd still lean towards folding here as i don't think there's enough value in paying 2 bets to see a showdown (the 83ish% of the time we dont improve) vs. a standard self taught player.
DcifrThs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2012, 01:43 AM   #41
Wot
 
Captain R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Money for nothin and chips for free
Posts: 6,129
Re: Weird Spot with No Pair

I think this spot is close, but with the BB still to act behind us, I think it pushes it towards a fold.
Captain R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2012, 11:25 AM   #42
grinder
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 578
Re: Weird Spot with No Pair

Only popping in here to say I'm entertained by those who use their number of live hours played as evidence of a correct strategy.

LOL @ 1500-1800 hours. Imagine if you used that amount of hands online as proof of your poker expertise.

I've seen multiples upon multiples of guys who have DERB'd it up for a year+ and are not at the tables anymore.
prophet73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2012, 04:21 AM   #43
enthusiast
 
GambleLifeAway's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 85
Re: Weird Spot with No Pair

Quote:
Originally Posted by La Peste View Post
no way I am folding this.
this

fwiw raising turn > calling > folding

since we're going to likely call a river bet anyway we should just pop it now to get the pot heads up. if villain has a fd or a gutshot (and by calling turn we've already accepted that these are in his range some %) we benefit substantially by pushing the loose passive player off a gutshot/ten outer. who knows maybe the loose passive even folds a small pair though i'm not counting on it.

these factors:

1) we are credibly repping a strong hand by raising
2) villain isn't a super aggro player
3) his line indicates a hand that can really never 3bet us
4) turn call makes us comfortable with the idea of showing down anyway

make this a pretty easy turn raise
GambleLifeAway is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive