Originally Posted by private joker

Not sure he can. He's more about giving two-word responses with hilariously exaggerated authoritarianism and then not backing up anything he says with even the most rudimentary reasoning. Standard MSLHE strat talk fwiw, nothing to see here.

Originally Posted by DpR

Pj is right, stick with his plan.

Originally Posted by private joker

Not sure he can. He's more about giving two-word responses with hilariously exaggerated authoritarianism and then not backing up anything he says with even the most rudimentary reasoning. Standard MSLHE strat talk fwiw, nothing to see here.

Originally Posted by jambony

this is a bit much; people don't get anything for posting strat advice, and it's often a net negative for them.

Originally Posted by private joker

Then why post at all? All I'm saying is, if you're going to post, say something. If you're not going to say anything, stop posting.

Originally Posted by Mort Stetson

I basically had the same end-goal as PJ in mind and normally would take the k/r line, but wanted to get tilted V1 stuck in the middle of a raising war rather than have him face 2 cold, figuring V2 would raise a lot of the holdings he could continue with. Or V1 may even raise and force V2 to call 2 cold with a hand that could continue, then I could 3!. I generally don't donk here, but at game speed was also worried that this flop could get checked through if V2 had red TT or AK without a spade and the idea of no money going in on this flop seemed tragic, so I donked figuring that my range was still pretty broad and could be anything from a draw to a set.

Based on advice here, it seems like k/r would have been better, especially since this happened: I donk, V1 folded, V2 called. My best guess on V2 range after calling was 99 and TT with a spade, and AK.

Turn was 3 of spades, so now there are 4 spades on the board. Should I:

check/call?
check/fold?
bet/call?
bet/fold?