Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Time to be optimistic? Time to be optimistic?

11-07-2014 , 12:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon_locke
What would your response be if you addressed the content of the post rather than the typos I don't care enough to correct?
Yo bing dup point hat dat.
Time to be optimistic? Quote
11-07-2014 , 12:27 PM
The good news Is that I will be in town and playing at talking Stick in late December and again at the Supebowl. We can talk in person. I'm sure most of you aren't as cocky or uptight as you seem on the forum.
Time to be optimistic? Quote
11-07-2014 , 01:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mongidig
Are they not?
you made fun of someone for typos/incorrect grammar/incorrect spelling/whatever... and then you used "here" instead of "hear" .... don't be a grammar/typing/formatting/spelling/diction nazi unless you are going to do everything correctly yourself.
Time to be optimistic? Quote
11-07-2014 , 01:38 PM
... or unless you are deliberately trolling.
Time to be optimistic? Quote
11-07-2014 , 01:41 PM
I'm at least as cocky in person, probably more. Please play 40/80 or bigger while here
Time to be optimistic? Quote
11-07-2014 , 02:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodeo
also, why didn't you get upset at me when i challenged your reads back in august in this thread?
I was saying the exact same thing in that thread that I'm saying in this one. I called somebody a 'solid reg' and people nitpicked over the definition of 'solid' rather than expending that energy discussing the hand.

I still think this forum is great and it's done a lot to advance my game. I just disagree with many regulars here about what it means to be 'terrible' 'decent' 'solid' etc.

Last edited by Mubsy Bogues; 11-07-2014 at 02:52 PM.
Time to be optimistic? Quote
11-07-2014 , 03:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mubsy Bogues
I was saying the exact same thing in that thread that I'm saying in this one. I called somebody a 'solid reg' and people nitpicked over the definition of 'solid' rather than expending that energy discussing the hand.

I still think this forum is great and it's done a lot to advance my game. I just disagree with many regulars here about what it means to be 'terrible' 'decent' 'solid' etc.
You start threads and ask questions like why would this solid winning pro take this line... People answer Becusse he's probably actually not solid...then you get upset that people concentrate on definition of solid rather than the line he took.
Time to be optimistic? Quote
11-07-2014 , 04:00 PM
lol

I never did that. It was just like the OP. I used a descriptive word followed by a bunch more info then people decided to nitpick the definition of my descriptive word.

Last edited by Mubsy Bogues; 11-07-2014 at 04:12 PM.
Time to be optimistic? Quote
11-07-2014 , 04:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mubsy Bogues
lol

I never did that. It was just like the OP. I used a descriptive word followed by a bunch more info then people decided to nitpick the definition of my descriptive word.
Your correct and I apologiZe, I meant moon not you. Most of his threads specifically center around the fact that particular villains are good/pros/winners etc.... And confusion over why they may take certain lines.
Time to be optimistic? Quote
11-07-2014 , 04:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathDonkey
I'm at least as cocky in person, probably more. Please play 40/80 or bigger while here
That's very nice of you to invite me to your game. I here those game are soft, bunch of bad regs. I'm looking forward to it
Time to be optimistic? Quote
11-07-2014 , 04:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon_locke
Your correct and I apologiZe, I meant moon not you. Most of his threads specifically center around the fact that particular villains are good/pros/winners etc.... And confusion over why they may take certain lines.
I haven't seen one of Moons posts for a while!
Time to be optimistic? Quote
11-07-2014 , 04:49 PM


click "play", scroll to the top, and read this thread with this video playing. everything starts to make much more sense.

Last edited by rodeo; 11-07-2014 at 05:02 PM.
Time to be optimistic? Quote
11-08-2014 , 08:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mongidig
That's very nice of you to invite me to your game. I here those game are soft, bunch of bad regs. I'm looking forward to it
They're also playing scared money on super short rolls. Definitely lobby to kick the game up. Then you can run over them as they try to reduce variance.
Time to be optimistic? Quote
11-09-2014 , 01:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mongidig
That's very nice of you to invite me to your game. I here those game are soft, bunch of bad regs. I'm looking forward to it
What he didn't tell you is that the new guy has to pay for the first two bottles of wine at the table and that Jon orders the first one and DD orders the second. Unless, of course, I'm there in which case ILR orders them both.

(ILR- We still good on that wine coaching for poker coaching swap?)
Time to be optimistic? Quote
11-09-2014 , 02:57 PM
Relax.... the first bottle will only cost thirty-seven fifty.
Time to be optimistic? Quote
11-09-2014 , 05:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by leo doc
(ILR- We still good on that wine coaching for poker coaching swap?)
You know it. I'm still working my way through all 9+ pages of background reading over in small stakes
Time to be optimistic? Quote
11-09-2014 , 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlanBostick
Relax.... the first bottle will only cost thirty-seven fifty.
Outstanding.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ILikeRocks
You know it. I'm still working my way through all 9+ pages of background reading over in small stakes
Reset to 100 posts/page. You'll be done in half the time.
Time to be optimistic? Quote

      
m