Quote:
Originally Posted by chillrob
Are you saying individual TSA agents are getting kickbacks? If so, that is so clearly horrible that I can't imagine how it was implemented. I thought earlier it was being said that one agency was getting paid by another, which, though not good, is not nearly as bad.
Yes, individual TSA agents were being paid as "confidential sources" to give info under the table. The linked PDF was a DEA memo saying it was wrong -- the DEA's contention was that it was wrong because they shouldn't have had to pay. The other linked article (or one of the others on the same thing) mentioned some Amtrack employee getting $2 million over 10 years to do the same thing.
The next time you want to waste an hour or two, read up on civil forfeiture stories. The ones I linked are only interesting/scary because a lot of us playing midstakes get on to planes carrying more money than mentioned in the story. There are other stories that are much more scary. I always feel OK because I keep the bank receipt for my cash withdrawal, but I'm sure some lawyer around here will correctly explain that it wouldn't stop a DEA agent who really wanted to just rob me.
Quote:
but voluntarily admitting to the authorities that you smoked weed on your way to the airpot isn't going to help your cause. And in this case it was the weed that made his bad smell of weed.
You are certainly correct.
Having read a bunch of cash seizure stories, it becomes clear that the "we'll have you wait and get a drug sniffing dog on site" thing is part of the pressure tactics. If you fail to just hand over the money (or just allow search), the dog shows up. Even if there are no drugs, the dog always gives some sign. This bogus probable cause allows search and then they find any cash and keep it.