I can't beat anything so I decide to bluff
09-05-2014
, 11:36 AM
Preflop:
UTG+1 opens -- bad tight passive, I've seen him limp EP with AT, some medium pairs.
CO calls -- on the tight passive side. I put his range on non-premium broadways, middle pairs, maybe some suited connectors. Maybe some AQ, AK in his range. He can play draws aggressively and may free-card. Has tendencies to fold and b/f scary rivers.
BB, Phunk, has A
Q
, and elects to just call.
Flop: A
T
5
UTG1 bets, CO raises, Phunk 3!, UTG1 calls, CO 4!, Phunk calls (Game has a 5 bet cap), UTG1 calls.
Turn: 4
Checked to CO, CO bets, call, call
River: 7
Checked to CO, CO bets, Phunk raises...
Analysis in spoil
UTG+1 opens -- bad tight passive, I've seen him limp EP with AT, some medium pairs.
CO calls -- on the tight passive side. I put his range on non-premium broadways, middle pairs, maybe some suited connectors. Maybe some AQ, AK in his range. He can play draws aggressively and may free-card. Has tendencies to fold and b/f scary rivers.
BB, Phunk, has A
Q, and elects to just call.Flop: A
T5UTG1 bets, CO raises, Phunk 3!, UTG1 calls, CO 4!, Phunk calls (Game has a 5 bet cap), UTG1 calls.
Turn: 4
Checked to CO, CO bets, call, call
River: 7
Checked to CO, CO bets, Phunk raises...
Analysis in spoil
Spoiler:
09-05-2014
, 11:43 AM
09-05-2014
, 03:54 PM
09-05-2014
, 04:21 PM
09-05-2014
, 08:58 PM
09-06-2014
, 04:32 AM
09-06-2014
, 02:03 PM
Do we have a x/r bluff range on this river? What is it? AK, A5?
In the actual hand, I think the river was J. I didn't remember exactly which diamond it was, and wrote it as the 7.
. I didn't remember exactly which diamond it was, and wrote it as the 7.
09-06-2014
, 04:32 PM
09-06-2014
, 08:03 PM
09-06-2014
, 10:05 PM
09-08-2014
, 01:09 PM
Spoiler time:
...River, Phunk x/r, UTG1 folds, Villain 3bs, Phunk folds. Villain courtesy shows his hand, A9.
...River, Phunk x/r, UTG1 folds, Villain 3bs, Phunk folds. Villain courtesy shows his hand, A
9.
09-09-2014
, 01:43 PM
Quote:
Preflop:
UTG+1 opens -- bad tight passive, I've seen him limp EP with AT, some medium pairs.
CO calls -- on the tight passive side. I put his range on non-premium broadways, middle pairs, maybe some suited connectors. Maybe some AQ, AK in his range. He can play draws aggressively and may free-card. Has tendencies to fold and b/f scary rivers.
BB, Phunk, has AQ, and elects to just call.
Flop: AT5
UTG1 bets, CO raises, Phunk 3!, UTG1 calls, CO 4!, Phunk calls (Game has a 5 bet cap), UTG1 calls.
Turn: 4
Checked to CO, CO bets, call, call
River: 7
Checked to CO, CO bets, Phunk raises...
Analysis in spoil
UTG+1 opens -- bad tight passive, I've seen him limp EP with AT, some medium pairs.
CO calls -- on the tight passive side. I put his range on non-premium broadways, middle pairs, maybe some suited connectors. Maybe some AQ, AK in his range. He can play draws aggressively and may free-card. Has tendencies to fold and b/f scary rivers.
BB, Phunk, has A
Q, and elects to just call.Flop: A
T5UTG1 bets, CO raises, Phunk 3!, UTG1 calls, CO 4!, Phunk calls (Game has a 5 bet cap), UTG1 calls.
Turn: 4
Checked to CO, CO bets, call, call
River: 7
Checked to CO, CO bets, Phunk raises...
Analysis in spoil
Spoiler:
09-12-2014
, 04:36 AM
10-23-2014
, 01:02 PM
You may have misplayed this hand but I think it was good for your overall poker game. Finding spots vs passive players is satisfying and profitable (except they're often old dudes that I like and feel bad for but I get over it). I think the issue here is that the same player who is capable of folding a big hand already checked behind with it cuz he was afraid of diamonds.