Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Limit Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes Limit

Notices

Medium Stakes Limit Discussions of medium stakes limit Texas Hold'em

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-10-2012, 08:25 PM   #16
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 15,506
Re: how thin is too thin

I don't know why we would single out certain hands for discounting but then give other hands their full combo weight. Based on how the hand has played out, I want to discount everything .

But I have no firsthand experience with how the Commerce 20/40 plays. Is checkraising an over plus gutshot (QT) versus a flop c-bet and call on JJ8 not unusual?
Nick C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 08:35 PM   #17
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
gaming_mouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: taking notes on u (see profile)
Posts: 11,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick C View Post
I don't know why we would single out certain hands for discounting but then give other hands their full combo weight. Based on how the hand has played out, I want to discount everything .

But I have no firsthand experience with how the Commerce 20/40 plays. Is checkraising an over plus gutshot (QT) versus a flop c-bet and call on JJ8 not unusual?
For a lag I wouldn't discount that much at all
gaming_mouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 08:40 PM   #18
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,143
Re: how thin is too thin

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick C View Post
I don't know why we would single out certain hands for discounting but then give other hands their full combo weight. Based on how the hand has played out, I want to discount everything .
For what it is worth, this captured my thought process when he raised.

"What the [bleep] could this be?"

Some observations:

1. I actually thought about T9, which would be a cool thing to do this with. (Can he fold out pocket queens by doing this? Maybe.) The thing about T9 is since he's folding to a 3-bet with that hand anyway, it doesn't really matter for our purposes. Might as well call and see the bluff. And by the way, even if I won the hand in that situation, credit where credit is due to any villain who would try this.

2. I didn't think enough about QT (although I'll spoil it a little by saying this isn't what he had). It's true, I could see a LAGGy villain x-raising this flop with a GSSD+1OC and then calling the 3-bet which tells him I have some sort of real hand. So I think you guys are right. That's a potential hand in his range and one we get value from.

3. The most logical hand has got to be AJ, even though it's a little weird that there was no pre-flop 3-bet. But as I said, we'd only played a couple of orbits together so he doesn't know that much about what my range might be. A cautious call out of the SB with this hand is possible. Then he raise-calls the flop with the intention of raising the turn, when a scare card comes out (I could have KJ or KK here), but then he x-raises the river. That's what I thought he had.

4. Everything else would, as Nick, bella, and others said, have been a kind of weird play by the villain. You'd think pocket jacks would 3-bet pre-flop. KJ would have been a completely weird slowplay on the turn (and also a slightly weird river raise given the A is actually a scare card to KJ and is also a card I might check behind on with some of my range), J8 merits the same comment as KJ, and Jx even more so. AK? As Bella said, LOL.

So the question really is how much screwplay do we put in a typical villain's range here, when we know little other than he's kind of LAGGy? I was completely flummoxed.
lawdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 08:53 PM   #19
Pooh-Bah
 
bakku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: i'm a monster!
Posts: 4,774
Re: how thin is too thin

Quote:
Originally Posted by lawdude View Post
For what it is worth, this captured my thought process when he raised.

"What the [bleep] could this be?"

Some observations:

1. I actually thought about T9, which would be a cool thing to do this with. (Can he fold out pocket queens by doing this? Maybe.) The thing about T9 is since he's folding to a 3-bet with that hand anyway, it doesn't really matter for our purposes. Might as well call and see the bluff. And by the way, even if I won the hand in that situation, credit where credit is due to any villain who would try this.
bluffing the river with T9 is spew imo


Quote:
3. The most logical hand has got to be AJ, even though it's a little weird that there was no pre-flop 3-bet. But as I said, we'd only played a couple of orbits together so he doesn't know that much about what my range might be. A cautious call out of the SB with this hand is possible. Then he raise-calls the flop with the intention of raising the turn, when a scare card comes out (I could have KJ or KK here), but then he x-raises the river. That's what I thought he had.
AJ doesn't make any logical sense based on your description. QT is the only hand that makes any sense. however, this is all assuming there is any logic behind the guy's play which is almost definitely a bad assumption
bakku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 11:17 PM   #20
veteran
 
OnTheRail15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Somewhere else
Posts: 2,698
Re: how thin is too thin

I don't think you guys are giving enough credence to random jx hands.
OnTheRail15 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 11:20 PM   #21
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
gaming_mouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: taking notes on u (see profile)
Posts: 11,948
Re: how thin is too thin

Quote:
Originally Posted by lawdude View Post

1. I actually thought about T9, which would be a cool thing to do this with. (Can he fold out pocket queens by doing this? Maybe.) The thing about T9 is since he's folding to a 3-bet with that hand anyway, it doesn't really matter for our purposes. Might as well call and see the bluff. And by the way, even if I won the hand in that situation, credit where credit is due to any villain who would try this.
i'd give him credit for making a hopeless bluff against a very strong hand range.


Quote:
3. The most logical hand has got to be AJ, even though it's a little weird that there was no pre-flop 3-bet. But as I said, we'd only played a couple of orbits together so he doesn't know that much about what my range might be. A cautious call out of the SB with this hand is possible. Then he raise-calls the flop with the intention of raising the turn, when a scare card comes out (I could have KJ or KK here), but then he x-raises the river. That's what I thought he had.
This is plausible actually, I'd add AJ to his range, discounting at least a little. Even after you do that, even if you don't discount it at all, we still have a 3b, though it's much closer.

Quote:
So the question really is how much screwplay do we put in a typical villain's range here, when we know little other than he's kind of LAGGy? I was completely flummoxed.
it doesn't matter how many random bluffs you but in his range, you only call about the ratio of hands that beat you to hands you'll get another bet out of.

Given that you have ruled out QT, the most likely contender, I think he had a random weird bluff or AA, followed by AJ
gaming_mouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2012, 12:04 AM   #22
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,143
Re: how thin is too thin

To be clear I did not rule out QT. I didn't think of it and consider that to be an error on my part.
lawdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2012, 12:10 AM   #23
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
gaming_mouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: taking notes on u (see profile)
Posts: 11,948
Re: how thin is too thin

Quote:
Originally Posted by lawdude View Post
To be clear I did not rule out QT. I didn't think of it and consider that to be an error on my part.
Quote:
2. I didn't think enough about QT (although I'll spoil it a little by saying this isn't what he had).
gaming_mouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2012, 12:50 AM   #24
veteran
 
efficacy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: bloggin
Posts: 3,302
Re: how thin is too thin

I would just call and take a mental note. We have the nut low full house. People do stupid **** prefflop live, so I'd not rule out any of the higher full houses unless I have a decent amount of history with the player.
efficacy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2012, 04:17 AM   #25
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,143
Quote:
Originally Posted by gaming_mouse View Post
You should not be confused. My spoiler is he did not have QT. But I still think I made a mistake not including it in his range.
lawdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2012, 08:10 AM   #26
Most Definitely
 
private joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Am I the boxer or the bag?
Posts: 25,228
Re: how thin is too thin

Quote:
Originally Posted by efficacy View Post
I would just call and take a mental note. We have the nut low full house. People do stupid **** prefflop live, so I'd not rule out any of the higher full houses unless I have a decent amount of history with the player.
I agree with this. And my experience at the Commerce 20 is that this river checkraise is a) for value; and b) it's not very often for value with Jx.
private joker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2012, 12:18 PM   #27
grinder
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 461
Re: how thin is too thin

With much love guys, please stop ttryingto ascribe any logic to a commerce 20 player. Plus, hero's read is based on a couple of orbits. This is a river check/raise in the commerce 20, which is always done with what the villian thinks is the nuts. That combined with the fact that everyone is scared, makes this kj or aj more than it does qt.
ninefingershuffle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2012, 03:50 PM   #28
Pooh-Bah
 
armor32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Verifying chips
Posts: 3,628
Re: how thin is too thin

Unrelated to the river discussion, I am wondering about pros and cons of calling flop and raising turn line ?
armor32 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2012, 04:17 PM   #29
Most Definitely
 
private joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Am I the boxer or the bag?
Posts: 25,228
Re: how thin is too thin

Quote:
Originally Posted by armor32 View Post
Unrelated to the river discussion, I am wondering about pros and cons of calling flop and raising turn line ?
Pros:
Cons: He folds everything but a jack to a turn raise, but calls down all sorts of stuff if we jam the flop. And when he does have a jack he'll check-raise the turn and we can 3-bet.
private joker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2012, 04:33 PM   #30
Rigged for her pleasure
 
bellatrix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: bloggin'
Posts: 4,750
Re: how thin is too thin

Quote:
Originally Posted by armor32 View Post
Unrelated to the river discussion, I am wondering about pros and cons of calling flop and raising turn line ?
I think online this would be the way to go, but live (at least my SoCal experience) people go so aggro with non-made hands on the flop (good draws), that you gain much more value charging the draws than disguising our hands against his value hands. That is why the info we get from the river is so important, people pump stuff like QT on the flop all the time live, but they love to slowplay a hand like AJ.

Also, on the river decision, OTR15 is right that we haven't given much credence to random Jx hands BTW, which is why I'm really waffling about the river decision.
bellatrix is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive