Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
80-160 -- K hi: to call or not to call 80-160 -- K hi: to call or not to call

03-17-2016 , 09:24 PM
whoa whoa, zzeigler plays live poker now?
80-160 -- K hi: to call or not to call Quote
03-17-2016 , 10:46 PM
Lol @ very strong thinking player. I heard about this lineup last Saturday I would love to know who you are talking about
80-160 -- K hi: to call or not to call Quote
03-17-2016 , 10:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrOlson
whoa whoa, zzeigler plays live poker now?
No the person who initially claimed he was zzeigler told me he is not. If you played with both at all you would know they can't be the same person
80-160 -- K hi: to call or not to call Quote
03-17-2016 , 11:05 PM
What does your hand look like to a very strong thinking player if you check and raise the river after the turn checks through? I think it looks like exactly what it is; trash.
80-160 -- K hi: to call or not to call Quote
03-17-2016 , 11:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Verona
What does your hand look like to a very strong thinking player if you check and raise the river after the turn checks through? I think it looks like exactly what it is; trash.
I mean that's how I would play Ax on River. Either they value bet river thinly, or they bluff random over cards that wouldn't call a bet. Really only lose value when they check back a hand they call a river bet with (which I think is far less than amount of hands they randomly bluff on River).
80-160 -- K hi: to call or not to call Quote
03-18-2016 , 01:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by magicmcq
I don't usually like outing villains in these threads, but since it's been mentioned already and there's so much confusion, I'll say villain was ZZ.

Regarding Paul's answer to the brain teaser, I'll give everyone the problem / paradox since I legitimately think it's interesting and cannot solve it at current.

The Envelope Problem:

Part 1) two envelopes are placed in front of you and you are told one contains twice As much money as the other, but the absolute quantities are unknown. So u pick one and open it and see $10. You are then asked if you wish to switch (this isn't the Monty hall problem I promise). The trivial calculation here is that the other envelope will contain half the money ($5) half the time and twice ($20) half the time. This means EV of switch is 12.5, or 5/4x. It would be, based on this reasoning, 5/4x regardless of the amount u open.

Part 2 / the paradox) You and another person each take one of these envelopes (same rules). In theory, from each of your perspectives, switching envelopes is a +EV proposition, but this is clearly a zero sum game. How is this possible?

I'm sorry but you're kind of messing up the description here. The paradox doesn't need a second person to switch with, and this not a zero sum game. The paradox is more basic and involves just one person: as soon as you've chosen one envelope and even before you open it, you could perform the EV calculation and decide that you should switch, and soon as you've done that you are forced to switch again etc.

The resolution of this paradox is instructive, it involves a careful consideration of what the expected value calculation looks like. Basically you can't just say there are two cases, and in one the value is 2A and the other is A, because A is a random variable whose expectation changes conditioned on which situation you're in. You should read the wikipedia article on it (two envelopes paradox), it has a lot of information and variants of the problem.

If you have trouble understanding the wikipedia explanation, then you should read the resolution of the necktie paradox first, that is much clearer and essentially the same thing.

Last edited by thesilverbail; 03-18-2016 at 01:51 AM.
80-160 -- K hi: to call or not to call Quote
03-18-2016 , 10:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by valdos
I think that in general people put too much effort into trying to manipulate ranges into profitable situations on this forum. And even when I agree with range equities I think the actual money that goes in out of position from the big blind isn't close to actual equity.
The mental manipulations that phunk goes through to create money in situations is somewhat mind boggling.

You should call river some percentage of time and check raise flop some really small percentage of time. But neither of these should be standard.
I haven't read the whole thread but I think that against some villains a flop k/r and a river call are closer to standard than to corner cases.

For what it's worth, I like a river raise too, depending on villain.

Last edited by Chasqui; 03-18-2016 at 10:55 PM.
80-160 -- K hi: to call or not to call Quote
03-19-2016 , 05:08 PM
The best play here is to just fold the flop in this tiny pot.

I am surprised to find anyone advocating calling this flop. And they say lhe is dead. LOL.
80-160 -- K hi: to call or not to call Quote
03-20-2016 , 02:42 AM
A. This strong thinking player only thoughts are how to get cheaper parking. The litany of mistakes he makes is about the only thing impressive about him. If you think he's a strong player it's only because you haven't seen him play enough.

B. The answer to the envelope is simple. Take both. You nerds aren't stopping me!
80-160 -- K hi: to call or not to call Quote
03-20-2016 , 02:21 PM
Admittedly, my knowledge of this villain was based on his reputation and what I had heard about him -- I'm not a regular at Borgata. I had heard that later in the day, for instance, he 3 bet an UTG raise full ring with A6s in the SB. I did not know this at the time though, so I felt it would be an unfair read to post.
80-160 -- K hi: to call or not to call Quote
03-22-2016 , 07:47 PM
how does this hand get this many posts-I've gotta start playing live on the east coast again
c/c flop. river intuitively seems somewhat close btwn c/r, but in game i doubt many people find the raise...which makes me even more inclined to raise...
80-160 -- K hi: to call or not to call Quote
03-22-2016 , 08:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chunkit4wanton
how does this hand get this many posts-I've gotta start playing live on the east coast again
c/c flop. river intuitively seems somewhat close btwn c/r, but in game i doubt many people find the raise...which makes me even more inclined to raise...
people dont bluff checkraise this river in game because nobody ever bet/folds a better hand enough to make it profitable, except a few whales who think they play well
80-160 -- K hi: to call or not to call Quote
03-23-2016 , 01:49 PM
meh i havent played in this 80 game in six months so you may be right. call.
next hand
80-160 -- K hi: to call or not to call Quote
03-26-2016 , 04:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chunkit4wanton
how does this hand get this many posts-I've gotta start playing live on the east coast again
c/c flop. river intuitively seems somewhat close btwn c/r, but in game i doubt many people find the raise...which makes me even more inclined to raise...
seat almost always open buddy . wish i coulda hung around and played more when it was the 3 of us that one time.

in terms of your response, like pete said, there's basically nothing he'd bet/fold here.

and separately, i'm liking the varied responses to the thread. so nice pick of a hand magic.
80-160 -- K hi: to call or not to call Quote
07-18-2016 , 08:10 PM
lol at anyone saying this flop is a fold( hint your suit manner a lot). and also lol at thinking ZZeigler is a fish. LHE is so behind and he still so far ahead in the curve. He does play super lag pre but I suspect he just think other player are a lot weaker post flop. I was coach by zzeigler for a month or two and things only make sense months later when dream machine came out that can actually calculated what GTO looks like instead of the old A-1 defense thinking that lhe came up with.
80-160 -- K hi: to call or not to call Quote

      
m