Quote:
Originally Posted by ZOMG_RIGGED!
As a rule of the thumb, if there are this many cards that are going to stop you from getting a turn raise you should be jamming the flop.
I feel like this is a misunderstood concept. Unless villain is going to be checking the turn a non-insignificant amount, I don't see how jamming the flop is going to gain more than delaying to the turn. Its not like we're hoping to B/3-b/C Flop, Raise turn here (maybe some are, but I think that would have been stated in responses.)
By delaying, we gives ourselves the option of putting in more bets than our flop jam flop line and we get to choose which cards we want to do it with. If we can't raise AQ on this turn, its because our hand just isn't that good anymore and there is nothing wrong with that. Its easy to forget the times we get to put in 2BB on the turn with 80% equity (just a guess) when a brick rolls off.
I suppose an argument could be made for jamming the flop if we felt villain was folding a lot of value to our delay raise line, but I don't see that as the case.
I feel like posters are being slightly results oriented in this case. If OP had posted the hand with a 2c rolling off on the turn and we raised, I doubt very many posters would have questioned his line.