I've had 3 pm's so far asking about the "did not want to discuss publicly" comment I made in my previous post. I said that because I didn't know if they were offering my friend one deal and other sub affiliates some better or worse deal. My friend hadn't told me what he had been offered (it was one of those I'm out the door will talk later type Skype conversations). Turns out nothing specific was offered, and Pas' plan was to sell the various US facing accounts and then all the sub affiliates would continue to receive what they are getting from new owners. Lets use Carbon as an example, the way I understand it every time a sub affiliate sends a player to carbon via pas they become part of one giant account that Pas has with Carbon. For reasons I haven't been told Pas can not split these players up and send them back to the sub affiliate that they came from. They would be allowed to transfer the entire Carbon account to someone. This was offered to my friend but they wanted more money than he had and even if he had the money he thought the price was unreasonably high.
I do understand why Pas is doing this: The New Jersey law they mention is this:
http://www.nj.gov/oag/ge/docs/Bullet...Affiliates.pdf
Among other things it says
"completely cease promoting or marketing, directly or indirectly, any illegal online gaming site accepting wagers from players in the US"
Pas claims their lawyers tell them they can still receive the rake back but if they give it to the players or sub affiliates it would be considered "promoting" and violate the law (ain't that convenient).
To me that sounds like bull**** but I'm not a lawyer nor did I read the law at the link above.
Returning to the Carbon example, what makes no sense to me is why Pas wouldn't be desperate to sell the Carbon account and ask a reasonable price? If the players no longer get rakeback wouldn't they all leave and go play somewhere else?
Perhaps I am mistaken and since Carbon pays the players their rakeback directly it isn't considered "promoting" if existing players continue to receive it. It's only "promoting" when Pas sends the sub affiliates their piece, (if that's true ain't that even more convenient for Pas).
These last couple of paragraphs I'm getting into pure speculation, I haven't been told any of this by anyone I'm just speculating.
If what I just speculated, Pas keeps all the existing RB players and tries to justify simply stiffing the sub affiliates that's clearly unacceptable.
That's all I know and sorry if my quick note in the previous post led anyone to believe I knew more.