Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Yeah, the thread was reported, but we let it stay. I don't think it's really my place to shut threads down because there's a possibility an overly-sensitive network may see a deal that looks too lucrative and decide to shut it down. I think that's greatly outweighed by the fact that this thread has taken some of the mystery out of the iPoker systems and helped a lot of people understand the different deals.
Maybe this was a mistake, IDK.
The only time speaking about systems that were too good to be true was wrong was in the good ol casino whoring days where the more attention to a juicy bonus pretty much led to it's immediate removal. Most people who were doing these bonuses knew that at the time so they realized that sharing their information in public would just be a - EV move.
This is different. A poker room's long term VIP program is not something that should be talked about in muffled hush hush tones. These are public programs and discussing their flaws and comparing them is how we will help generate stable VIP benefits that are better for most players long term in that they know what to expect.
Stars is a perfect example of this. Openly discussed, and at times tweaked to meet changing needs. Compare that to Party's system which I think utilized the pick unrelated, confusing features randomly from a hat and let's see how it works approach.
Ipoker's is even more of a mess. All of the hush hush under the table nonsense just means they have a very poorly thought out affiliate system in place. VIP programs that are simply too good to be true being approved (as Plex's was) do not represent a good long term approach, even if players, including myself, benefit from it short term.
I certainly understand why a player would keep certain features about a room or network quiet (overlays, double stacking of bonus bugs etc) for their own benefit, I could make a crazy list of all the ones that were possible on Crypto over the years.
However, if we cannot discuss a network's VIP policy without fear of it being compromised then that network needs a lot of basic improvements in how to do business. Thus, even if discussion leads to some deals poofing, if it helps make their system better and cleaner and more transparent then that is better for us all.
Kudos to the OP and for those who chose not to lock/delete this thread.