Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyLond
Love is a choice. It is not a feeling but a behavior. It's a decision to do nice things for someone just for the sake of seeing them happy. All types of love share this definition and anything that doesn't is not love.
Yes, mostly. A behavior makes it seem as tho it's something that requires action and others. You could sit in a cave the rest of your life meditating, having little to no interactions with another person and could feel pure love. It is an experience, your experience. It is your perception of life that is ever changing around you(refer to the 2 examples I posted above).
It is a choice, a choice between love and fear. Love is the absence of fear. Anger, jealousy, sadness, selfishness, etc....these are all emotional states of being that derive from fear based thinking.
When someone does something that makes you angry, do you get angry or do you become anger? Is the anger separate from you in any way? You become it and it overtakes your logical mind and we see people get into arguments, fights, road rage, murder because for a brief moment their state of being became anger and took over their logical intellectual mind. They identified with the emotion they felt and they let that identification change their internal being over an outside circumstance. But other people or changing circumstances can't make us angry just by happening, we choose to let them. Life is always changing, we don't have any control over that....but we determine our state of being, that is the only thing we have control over....and our actions derive from our state of being.
In the same way love is a choice and you choose that state of being. In choosing that you become love and your actions are derived from that state of being. So of course you would...."do nice things for someone just for the sake of seeing them happy" Optimally, when outside circumstances change you don't identify with your emotions, you realize life is change and change is always happening and you choose to be love all the time.
You see stories on the new from time to time like this...
A car drives off bridge into a river and a passerby jumps in to save the person. Everyone calls this person a hero because, logically they look at the situation and know that this man risked his life to save that person and they can't imagine if they were in the same situation they would necessarily do the same. They think about it too much and it seems amazing someone would but they can't see logically how someone would risk their life for someone they don't even know.
They interview the "hero" and ask him if he thinks he's a hero. He inevitably says no and when asked how he did it or why, usually responds he doesn't really know and that it all happened so fast he never really thought about it or the dangers involved, etc...
This is because when we don't identify with our fear, deep down we are love. So in his actions derive from love and he jumps in to save the drowning person. When asked how he did it or why....he never did think about it...he just saw suffering, and life about to come to an abrupt end and jumping in to save them was a derivative of love and compassion for all life.