https://www.google.com/search?q=elli...&bih=666&dpr=2

Images of elliptical craters

Right. And because you think they look circular, it *must* be true. After all, it's not like anyone has *ever* taken pictures of elliptical craters on the moon, or done anything remotely resembling a survey of crater shapes. But since you think they're circular, the facts simply don't matter.

But regardless of that, you acknowledge their existence, yes?

It appears that by applying a simple scientific approach and critical mind I am once again found to be more learned about the heliocentric spinning ball religion than some of its followers.

From Dr Alastair Gunn
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sci...-circular/amp/

Did you not know about the vaporising? Have you never read a comic book?
Which means that due to the insane speeds required etc a replication of the event to "experiment" as to possible causes is impossible.

Really? Care to cite some of these elliptical images, as I have just asked for? Generic Google search doesn't wash here. I want actual image of moon with source supplied etc.

As I said, I can see with a basic telescope "craters" on the moon of circular shape.

I wonder if you actually understand what you've read. Because this seems to have little bearing or resemblance to your previous statement:

You just cited an article that acknowledges elliptical craters. I think that's good enough for me. But if you would like, you can stare at the moon yourself and take pictures, and then present the evidence of circular craters. Please be certain to have careful measurements to verify circularity.

Also, LOL at this:

Everyone gets the *best* science from comic books!

LOL. Actual images don’t wash?

1. Please debunk every single google image. Specifically, not as a group.
2. Please observe every single crater in existence then come back to us to debunk elliptical craters.
3. Please prove what you see through your telescope is accurate. Satan can put any image he wants into those things.

Still waiting to hear what you think causes craters.

Let's be honest you had no idea either that they are "caused" by a vaporising massive heat fireball etc. You can't get away with asserting such gibberish but apparently the higher the qualification the more outlandish the claims become. Doctors of science claiming "causation" without any hint of experiment should ring at least some alarms. I doubt it.

Merry Christmas

It would be easier to present one verified image.
You cannot determine cause in a scientific context, which is our context, without a properly performed experiment. It's over and any so called scientist asserting anything different is a fraud and you should be calling them out.
You can get the same effect using electrical discharge which is a valid and plausible explanation ie it does not depend on pieces of rock hurtling through second law of thermodynamics violating regions impacting impossible spheres covered by or made of gas creating absurd amounts of heat generated by vaporising massive bits of iron that just happen to be orbiting by means of the bending of a conceptual medium a giant ball of gas. In a vacuum.

Just so I’m clear, you need a certified photo, with a clear evidentiary trail/provenance, yet you’re owning us with word salad? Narcissism is a thing yall.

Yes I'm owning you. You are asking me for the cause when cause cannot possibly be determined.
My question was about elliptical craters, whether they exist and how prevalent they are. I have since found they are apparently very rare as the vast majority of oblique "impacts" (and we can assume the vast majority of "impacts" are oblique, correct?) apparently cause a circular crater because the effect is caused by an explosion. Cool story right. I am interested as to what "very rare" means. I would like an image of just one and to compare this to a circular crater to try to determine if they can reasonably be assumed to be of the same nature as a circular one. Of course this is futile for the reasons stated but I am interested in exploring how much of this is based on assumptions having been programmed into our collective consciousness. We all just seem to know that craters are caused by meteors despite having very little understanding of what is actually being asserted by our pseudo science priests.

Please tell us more of what QAnon has told you.

You’re not “owning” anyone, because no one is seriously debating with you about how craters are formed.

I had to look up QAnon Tbh. Terrible stereotyping which to be fair to yourself is typical of the level of discussion in basically any forum anywhere today. People are incapable of reasoning based on the information being presented, leaps are made to pigeon hole the conjured adversary into a pre conceived box easily labelled and dismissed. A means of avoiding cognitive dissonance, never entertaining an idea that just might contradict a held belief.

So true... so very, very true...

It's like a 2 outer on the river.

2 outer happens ALWAYS. And the survey results from Narnia, what do these suggest? It's almost as if, like almost as if 5% of 90 degrees is like 4.5 degrees so like that would be a wheely shallow angle but anything >4.5 degrees is an auto circle, like just auto circular! This is amazing, a freak of nature. Like quads every hand.

The irony

You literally believe there’s a conspiracy to hide the “truth” about the make up of the universe. What bigger conspiracy theory could there be?

Fwiw, on Dec 12th of last year in qpost #2622, qanon (which is a psy-op), was asked during an "ask me anything" session specifically if the earth is flat and the answer was "no".


Also I'd like to submit a photo for certification. Picture taken by me on the 11th of October, 2016 in the central US.
I don't think "certified photos" are necessary btw. Decently sure the craters are mapped and known.

Good pic. All looking circular from here.

Check this one out:





Also explains in this article that electric discharge fits very well with many other observations of craters.

But here's the rub

https://www.thunderbolts.info/webnew...riccraters.htm

But it's a considerably more compelling argument than anything mainstream pseudoscience has to offer on this subject.

Just for fun, here's a 1962 paper that catalogs that locations of craters on the moon, including locations so that others can look them up. They have a specific note for elliptical craters (*1) that the were able to detect with the technology of the time

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19630002477

And here's a database of 1.3 million craters. I didn't bother downloading the database to see the structure of the data and determine if they note anything about the geometry of the craters. with craters of smaller size, it's less likely to be able to measure deviations of shape.

https://astrogeology.usgs.gov/search...e_robbins_2018

Of course we are not rotating broohahaha



Oh wait wtf distances are preserved exactly as rotation expects...


But of course with the minor exception if you do it 6 months later for only a few of them exactly as a bigger distribution of distant stars would expect ... I wonder why?