With futurenomics we can induct science by philosophizing about things we can't yet do but know is possible (although I'll be honest no one seems to realize this reverse engineering is possible).

But I think you are suggesting someone who can smash stars already knows what will happen. If thats true then there is still something to be gained by doing it.

If you are saying there is nothing to learn from it, then I can't relate to you.

But anyways this leads to whether or not we can move galaxies and larger entities like this and eventually universes. ULHC's (ultimate)

Do you have an example of this?

Do you have a reference for this, or did you just make this up?

Ya its in the futurenomics thread...we are going to induct time travel, from first study a life 'with time travel' and then later reverse engineering it into our consciousness. Cause after time travel is just a matter of destroying false assumptions in our science.

You want an example of a period in time where if you went up to someone and said "Hey I'm gonna smash two tiny specs together really fast" and the farmer says in Aramaic "Shut up, thats useless, go to sumer and get me 2 oxen"?

No, what I meant was: Do you have an example where this process has worked, since you seem so confident that it is a workable process.


Well, you said this:

So I assumed that you could provide a quote to back that up. Or you just made it up.

I should just leave you alone. It would be easier if you would stop talking [posting], but probably little chance of that.

Ya I do, head to the Futurenomics thread.

I'm just saying I don't need a quote whatsoever to back up the assertion that at some point in history humans thought the idea of smashing particles together seemed useless.