Quote:
Originally Posted by drowkcableps
With perfect honesty I recall falling into a deep low of which sleep was prayed for…
And a campfire where I thought I might have solved something important about the brain.
Without these experiences being fresh in mind, and perhaps lacking sample size, my view may be relatively superficial...
The time scale in between shifts of emotion seems irrelevant, it is the shifts that I attribute to the flip of the coin. What’s relevant is does one state have some connection/causation to the other, which was the interesting point I was opposing.
It's handy that you've used the word 'opposing' there because I think that one state defines the opposing state. To provide a silly analogy, try to imagine a world without any bad behaviors: in such a world how would we know what the good behaviors are? There is no 'positive' without something 'negative' to give it meaning/to define it.
By the same measure, the worse the 'negatives' that have been experienced, the greater the capacity for positive experiences to be enjoyed. A person who has experienced a devastating loss (the deep low) for example, is likely to gain more happiness, appreciation and gratitude for other close relationships in his life (the deep high), than a person who has not experienced such a deep low.
Now I'm not entirely sure if we're talking crosswind of each other but thought I'd better clarify my viewpoint in case not.
Last edited by VeeDDzz`; 02-26-2015 at 07:37 AM.