Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Attention David Sklansky Attention David Sklansky

09-20-2014 , 10:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElliotR
Nice forum you've got here, Zeno.
17. Kf1 Be6!!
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-20-2014 , 10:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElliotR
Nice forum you've got here, Zeno.
"Be a shame if anything were to...happen...to it"
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-20-2014 , 10:44 PM
Perhaps DS's public reaction to the attack on Brucez seemed like the The Lady Who Wouldn't Do CPR.
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-20-2014 , 11:17 PM
yadrutas?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeno
Yes, it is hard to categorize. But once moved, I can't move it out of this forum to another forum as I have no mod powers here. It will have to be moved by the Probability Moderator.
I guess its possible too that its just so poorly written/thought out that you might have successfully buried it.

In the meantime I thought I would invoke the old poker constitution plus give a small puzzle in case we need breaks here and there from op http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/25...ution-1476098/

I figure it can hold because its relevant and intenful for the game. Also scientific, mathematical, and philosophical in its nature. Besides if no one here/can will answer/help, then it might as well be deleted (along with me).

<<< on record that I appreciate the owners and this forum for the inspiration and eduction it has brought to me and no doubt many others.

I think though we collectively lack strong game theory knowledge, because we seem to have studied strategy so long we feel the point is non-cooperative solutions and games.

A friend won a Ju Jitsu competition tonight, but Ju Jitsu means "gentle art". How far is that?

I'm using the forum sideways!

(conflict and competition in the name of advance was humanity's most ridiculous proposal supported only by a past we claim to have "evolved" from)

Also I think if we put our heads together we could solve that water freezing competition/question and maybe develop a new force.

If someone might kindly point out where my concept of MP fails, then I can go back to my drawing board!

Last edited by EtheruemPoker; 09-20-2014 at 11:41 PM.
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-20-2014 , 11:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EtheruemPoker
yadrutas?
You all don't really understand the anal sex?
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-21-2014 , 12:07 AM
i'm here for the gangbang

but seriously, i respect DS. a lot. if it weren't for him, I wouldn't have done a lot more with my late teens/early twenties than **** around with drugs and **** I had no business dealing with. Poker led me to something cool, and there wasn't a lot of cool **** going on in my life back then.

That said, jesus ****ing christ dude. You completely embody the stereotypical professional poker player, a chronic underachiever who honestly was probably only led to poker because of intellectual laziness. You have the raw ability, but you didn't use it in any meaningful way. Poker's the opposite of meaningful. Becoming an expert in a zero sum game in an industry that frequently destroys lives - that's the legacy you've left.

Over the years I've read so many of your posts and OPs and have frequently been astounded at how someone with so much raw brainpower could be so obtuse at times.
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-21-2014 , 01:16 AM
Shots fired.
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-21-2014 , 01:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmakinmecrzy
Over the years I've read so many of your posts and OPs and have frequently been astounded at how someone with so much raw brainpower could be so obtuse at times.
At least he isn't racist like this guy was:




But of course, David must be judged for more than his excellent job regarding poker, like Bruce must be judged for more than his excellent job helping others in math.

As I've said earlier, the bathroom post I found "not necessarily racist". Interesting David posted that much about it.

Last edited by plaaynde; 09-21-2014 at 01:26 AM.
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-21-2014 , 02:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomCowley
Amen.



David's. It should be dark in Vegas soon. Somebody convert that Luxor beam to the Cockatoo-signal.
Does he still play at the Bellagio or has he moved on to a different venue?


I apologize for the zigzag nature in which the OP was finally delivered to the masses.
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-21-2014 , 02:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EtheruemPoker
yadrutas?

I guess its possible too that its just so poorly written/thought out that you might have successfully buried it.
True. I have a fault of allowing too much drivel and always err on the side of hoping something good and meaningful will work its way out of whatever is posted. Probably not a wise blanket policy and I may need to tweak it a bit to save my mod status.


Thanks for the advice.
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-21-2014 , 03:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeno
Does he still play at the Bellagio or has he moved on to a different venue?


I apologize for the zigzag nature in which the OP was finally delivered to the masses.
I don't know what (or if) he's playing these days. I'm not worried about the path the post took (and DS would have read it anyway in the mod forum).
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-21-2014 , 03:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomCowley
I don't know what (or if) he's playing these days. I'm not worried about the path the post took (and DS would have read it anyway in the mod forum).
From what I know, that did not happen.

I'm sure he has read it now though.
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-21-2014 , 03:44 AM
Who the **** is OP to ask for anyone's apology via a 2+2 thread unless DS has personally done him some kind of harm or insult?

The presumption and arrogance is astounding.
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-21-2014 , 03:59 AM
David Sklansky is a little eccentric but he's ok by me.
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-21-2014 , 10:28 AM
Trying to think of fair remedy here. Maybe you could give the Cowboys coach mod forum access?
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-21-2014 , 10:38 AM
All you guys have to do is sum up all of Sklansky's nerd points and then subtract the demerits. Not sure where all this emotional crap is coming from.

I'll start by assigning 10 nerd points for Theory of Poker, but will have to demerit at least 8 points for that god awful book on NLHE.
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-21-2014 , 11:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kioshk
David Sklansky is a little eccentric but he's ok by me.
I think this is a great summation. And I agree.

It is also a wise and measured response. Which is precisely what the Forum and 2+2 need right now.
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-21-2014 , 12:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeno
True. I have a fault of allowing too much drivel and always err on the side of hoping something good and meaningful will work its way out of whatever is posted. Probably not a wise blanket policy and I may need to tweak it a bit to save my mod status.


Thanks for the advice.
I know zeno, but think about it, you don't even have to encrypt the cards!

That's why I think it might be valid, a bunch of things cancelled themselves out...(thats never happened to me before)
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-22-2014 , 04:16 AM
That sure took a lot of words to get to the "please apologize to someone" part.
Attention David Sklansky Quote
09-22-2014 , 09:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeno
I think this is a great summation. And I agree.
But who disagrees? DavidS is easily one of the top 5 posters itf. My favorite was when he explained that the reason rich celebrities favor progressive taxation is because they feel guilty for not being good at math. Although I guess this means he owes Sean Penn an apology too.
Attention David Sklansky Quote

      
m