I dont' see what the harm would be of trying replay on a limited trial basis for a few years. If it turns out to cause major problems then scrap it. But as everyone pretty much knows deep down, it would work tremendously well if used in specific circumstances with specific rules.
X-post
At least the people who are against replay in this thread are coming up with real arguments as to why. While I don't agree with them, they're at least grounded in reality.
Everytime I hear someone spout off with that "We can't eliminatethe human element, it's what makes the sport great." I want to go curb stomping them.
People who use this as an argument against replay should be universally ridiculed. We're very familiar with it in the US as baseball schmucks regeritate it frequently.
It's a text book example of a made up, non-sensical, hocus pocus, appeal to emotion "reason" You might as well say you're against it because God doesn't want it in the game or because your favorite color is blue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by valenzuela
too bad this is 2+2, the world is full of stupid people and they ruin stuff more important than football.
You'll find the discussion here on any subject about a million times more intelligent that with average people on the street about soccer or anything really.