Quote:
Originally Posted by t3hbandit
lol GTFO with this nonsense you were the one who started getting arsey with your "pundits hate him" dribble.
I was, not clearly enough apparently, mimicking a clickbait type article* as simple and dumb as your statement to express my disagreement. When you seemed to ignore what I actually said, I explained why I disagreed.
I can see how it confused you as a lot of pundits probably do actually dislike Mourinho, don't know how it is in England. Sorry for triggering you.
guy loses weight using simple tricks, doctors hate him -> guy solves football using long balls, pundits hate him. Number xx will surprise you -> number 27** is especially horrid.
**I thought it was obvious I meant long ball receiver extraordinaire MF27.
Quote:
Originally Posted by t3hbandit
At no point did I claim what Mourinho did was a tactical masterstroke but the fact that it completely nullified you meant he was right to do it.
You did actually claim that "playing long balls meant Ajax had no answer", but teams play long balls against us all the time and playing long balls barely had anything to do with why were nullified offensively and even less with why we lost the game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by t3hbandit
lol@ if we had been a bit sharper it wouldn't have been a problem. Did you even have a shot that wasn't from outside the box or create 1 clear chance? Ajax were awful and deserved to lose.
I mean that the long balls would not at all have been a problem.
A long ball into a siege tower (way outside the box) is nothing in and of itself, it was only somewhat useful because the followup ball was hardly fought for by Ajax and so it let United easily keep possession. And I say
somewhat useful because I can't even recall a chance being created from those situations.
I never denied that Ajax were awful and deserved to lose. Stop muddying the waters by yelling things as if I said otherwise.
For the record, I think Uniteds tactics were bad. Just found it very odd to see you praise their playing of long balls when it was hardly innovative, hard or a key factor in winning this particular game.