Didn't supreme Court rule no mandated breathalyzer a while back? Need a warrant for blood I think.

Source?

I would like to know about the strapped down, forced needle draw too.

If a person is twisting like a raging lunatic, will the cop point a gun at them and order him to stop moving or else? And if they move, the cop shoots you?

Is this a death-row execution table they strap you against?

If you are flinching around, a needle can do serious harm to you or the nurse too. Maybe this is the method to choose and just complain about the constitutionality of the state forcing a needle into your body against your will for a non-violent offense.

https://www.noozhawk.com/article/042...aws_dui_cases/

You can't, it appears, in CA force a blood draw unless there are unusual
circumstances like a hit and run or some type of danger.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm not sure if you're referring to the same thing or not. You could refuse a breathalyzer, but then you have to submit to a blood draw. If you refuse the blood draw after refusing the breathalyzer, then they just take it from you with a forced blood draw.

It does seem that there's been more Supreme Court action on forced blood draw, even though there's still implied consent in place with your driver's license/vehicle code, depending on the agency they might be required to obtain an expedited warrant to be able to gather their evidence from you before your bac level dissipates. I wonder how hard that warrant is to obtain

This article does a good enough job of explaining it
http://www.callawyer.com/2016/08/dui...rant-required/

Tiger Woods says no alcohol involved and it was a "mix-up" of medication. Why not just take a breathalyzer then unless the concern it would be 0.00? What medication "mix-up" happens at 3:00am in the morning?

Supreme Court ruled on DUI checkpoints if I recall, you don't have to submit to their questions. I assume Tiger was probably just pulled over.

I was in jury duty once where a guy had a dui but we voted him innocent.

Of course it had nothing to do with alcohol, Eldrick

His professionally approved statement says so. We don't need a breathalyzer which is why he refused to take it because there was no alcohol involved.

Good luck on spinning this more and more.

Better to hide for the rest of the year and hope it goes away.

Where's that forced blood draw when you need it right?

Tiger seems to be making the correct and expected moves here.

How disappointing!

lol

I've read three different short articles about this and none of them have mentioned him refusing a breathalyzer test. Where did that come from?

TMZ. Now why would they have to lie?

Others are running with it.

I think it could have been a good PR move by Tiger if was .10 or higher.

Does this mean he can't pilot a boat?
What about drive in other counties like Barbados?

Full arrest report coming out tomorrow.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It was either that statement or swearing on a relative's grave.

Did ESPN really photoshop his booking photo to make him look much more presentable?

https://www.google.com/amp/amp.timei...3Fsource%3Ddam


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Great, now ESPN is fake news too.

1. It depends if you need a boating license in the place you are operating the vessel. In many places you don't need one.

2. To drive in other countries, you typically need a license of some kind. If you don't have one, you can't drive. But if he has an extra copy of his Florida license, it wouldn't be an issue.

Also, on the "should I refuse the breathalyzer" question, here is an opinion from an attorney.

"The majority of states have some type of "implied consent" law, which means refusing a breathalyzer test usually does more harm than good.
"(An implied consent law) means that when you sign up for your driver's license, you also consent to taking a breathalyzer test upon demand from a police officer," says Eric Misterovich, a DUI attorney at Newburg Law in St. Joseph, Michigan.
Many times people refuse a breathalyzer because they don't want to provide evidence of their blood alcohol to police out of fear of being arrested. However, the penalty for refusing the breath test can be harsher than the OWI (operating while intoxicated) charge, says Misterovich.
"In short, at least for first-time offenders where there is no car accident or bodily injury, refusing to take a breathalyzer will likely subject you to greater penalties than the OWI" in Michigan, says Misterovich."

That wording is pretty terrible. Refusing an actual breathalyzer test means you are already arrested. Refusing a field breathalyzer test is standard and should always be done.

More likely this was a group text and there were 10-15 simultaneous incidents around the country occurring at anywhere vacuous women spend money.

https://twitter.com/TomNamako/status/869356099706736642

obviously NYPost cover>NY DailyNews cover but

"Washed Up Golf Legend Busted In Florida">>>"Woods Hits Rock Bottom"

Couple more gems. The 2nd one is savage.

Why would he claim medication? You can still be arrested for DUI for that pretty sure. Basically admitting guilt

Its an interesting month when Tiger gets a dui and John Daly gets a win.