Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooders0n
If it were just 5 random games probably not but it's been some of the most high profile marquee regular season games the networks get all year. Considering they have now already realized they've overpaid then when it comes time to negotiate the next contract it could easily cost the league hundreds of millions of dollars. These contracts are worth billions.
It's really only happened twice. Cavs-Clips where the big 3 sat out and then Warriors-Spurs.
A new TV deal will probably be lower than this one no matter what. The networks are bleeding subs/talent and ESPN legitimately might be busto within 5 years if they don't do something drastic. It's kind of ironic that the league is getting fat off of a huge, unsustainable TV deal caused by the networks overpaying, and now it may swing the other way with the players having to take the hit down the road. I keep thinking back to the Mozgov and Deng contracts for the Lakers. Moz got like 16 million a year and barely played, and has been shut down for a few weeks now. To me, that screams that salaries are in bubble territory. When Mozgov is making like 9x or whatever of someone like Dedmon or Biyombo who are both far more useful, that's not a good sign. Stuff like that probably isn't sustainable in the long run. Just paying guys huge sums of cash to essentially fill a team/make the salary floor or ride the bench probably won't be a thing in a few years or once the new TV deal comes around.
A clause like "if 1 star player (determined by x y z metrics) sits for rest during a prime time game, it costs the network 5% less" etc might help a bit, but then you get into things like stars playing 1 min then sitting, or faking injuries or whatever.
Isn't the league doing away with b2b's next year anyway?