Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN)

03-25-2017 , 07:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8bus
eddy is being disingenuous and if not then he's just really dumb

i'm sure pop monitoring rest for 10+ years has nothing to do with duncan and ginobli playing until 39
duncan played the equivalent of over 3 full seasons of playoff basketball (251 games) in 19 seasons, even after missing the 2000 playoffs with a meniscus tear. 2nd all time to derek fisher
ginobli played the equivalent of 2.4 (197 games) in 15 seasons. 10th all time.
parker has played the equivalent of over 2.5 (213 games) in 16 seasons. 7th all time and with 8 games he will pass shaq and kobe this season for 5th all time.

those three combined are 30% of the all time top 10 in playoff games played, and the spurs were in the playoffs every season of their careers.
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-25-2017 , 08:07 PM
is that supposed to be a point in the other direction of them resting? because it's not
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-25-2017 , 08:15 PM
it was my attempt to reinforce the idea of them resting. it doesn't even seem debatable.
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-25-2017 , 08:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buccofan86
Oh yeah, I'm sure playoff and finals ratings will tank due to LeBron sitting regular season game 43 in Memphis in January or whatever it was. People will cry about it and will still watch, and still pay up for tickets. Only real loser for now is the idiot networks who overpaid. Maybe the cap ends up going down or not rising as much, but so what? The Lakers paid huge money to Mozgov and Deng who aren't even seeing the court anymore. Maybe it's unsustainable to have the cap going up and up and up forever by huge % changes year over year. Doesn't mean the league will be busto or losing money any time soon
The league won't go bust, but revenue will decrease which will mean less money for everyone involved. Game 43 generates a lot revenue too. The fact that the Finals are a lot more important doesn't mean Game 43 is irrelevant.

"But so what?" is hundreds of millions of dollars to the players, owners, and coaches.
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-25-2017 , 08:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by REDeYeS88
it was my attempt to reinforce the idea of them resting. it doesn't even seem debatable.
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-25-2017 , 08:33 PM
Jordan during his age 32-34 season played 82 games, and oh yeah 3 peated during that time too. All while playing 38 minutes a game.
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-25-2017 , 08:35 PM
I think he got a lot of rest right before that
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-25-2017 , 08:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyB66
Jordan during his age 32-34 season played 82 games, and oh yeah 3 peated during that time too. All while playing 38 minutes a game.
anecdotal evidence really makes your point stronger
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-25-2017 , 08:37 PM
yeah eddy is completely helpless
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-25-2017 , 08:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyB66
Jordan during his age 32-34 season played 82 games, and oh yeah 3 peated during that time too. All while playing 38 minutes a game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tabbaker
I think he got a lot of rest right before that
he played 0 games in 93-94 and 17 games in 94-95. He also didn't play for the three seasons after 97-98. How exactly does this help your argument?
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-25-2017 , 08:46 PM
My argument is that you don't need to rest guys to win a championship. It is possible to have your players play every game of the season, and then still succeed.
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-25-2017 , 08:47 PM
no one is arguing that. it's about optimization of the players' careers.
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-25-2017 , 08:49 PM
There's not really any evidence it helps the players careers either.
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-25-2017 , 08:59 PM
Yeah if we just have all the stars quit in their prime for 2 years then play 3 years and quit again at age 34 it'd be gold!
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-25-2017 , 09:03 PM
NathIsRight
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-26-2017 , 04:05 AM
There's also not evidence that it doesn't not help players careers.
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-26-2017 , 06:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyB66
Show me an instance of a star player getting hurt because he played too much.
Every single injury that occurs in play is because a player played too much.
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-26-2017 , 08:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyB66
Correct me if I'm wrong, but before Popovich started doing this, teams still won championships right?
this is my favorite post in this thread so far

Eddy baby, teams won championships before the 3-pointer was introduced, right?
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-26-2017 , 08:40 AM
Well Popovich sure did a good job resting Timmy in Game 6 vs the Heat. They didn't get to win the championship, but at least the fans got to watch Duncan play until he was 40.
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-26-2017 , 09:41 AM
You're an actual ******

Hope this helps
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-26-2017 , 09:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8bus
You're an actual ******

Hope this helps


You rest your guys, I'll play my guys. When we meet up, we are coming for blood. Battle tested and ready for war! Pussification personified. Hope this helps.
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-26-2017 , 10:09 AM
Also, you want to know what will be a real bad eye sore for the NBA, is when the first class action lawsuit happens.

Teams are charging tiered pricing when teams like Clev and GS come to town. Well why are you charging me more money to see Liggins and Felder play? 25,000 fans x $30 a piece adds up when you consider the amount of times it happens.
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-26-2017 , 10:13 AM
It'd be one segment on First Take, some jerkoff lawyer fan isn't going to make waves.

Just wait until the first lawsuit over the price of preseason NFL games!!!

Caveat Emptor
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-26-2017 , 10:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DodgerIrish
It'd be one segment on First Take, some jerkoff lawyer fan isn't going to make waves.

Just wait until the first lawsuit over the price of preseason NFL games!!!

Caveat Emptor


So you are perfectly fine with being charged a premium and then not getting what you paid for. If that's the case ship me $25 on PP and I'll send you an empty Trump box. Preseason tickets in the NFL aren't exactly the same thing. They aren't charging you 70% more for those tickets.
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote
03-26-2017 , 10:48 AM
I got the lawsuit that causes the NFL to cease to exist as a bigger deal than this one.
Sports Media Discussion (RIP ESPN) Quote

      
m