|
|
| Sporting Events Discussion centered around sporting events. |
02-24-2012, 06:00 PM
|
#6001
|
|
addicted
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: vṛkṣāsana
Posts: 45,796
|
Re: SE WW 4.0: The GOCB's vs the WANGZ
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Anyone think the neutrals icing Auger = mjw is neutral?
|
That was my thought. But fanmail's gambit looked like it got a village reaction.
But a neutral who knows he peeks vanilla village would react that way too.
nozecandy, btw.
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 06:00 PM
|
#6002
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: lol goofybawler
Posts: 29,251
|
Re: SE WW 4.0: The GOCB's vs the WANGZ
Quote:
Originally Posted by atakdog
I need to be gone for a while, but will be back for eod.
Goofy, I am going to let you direct my night action (if it exists). It is a power that, if it works, will be pretty bad for the target, so it needs not to be used on clear or likely villagers. If it works, it will probably be clear in the morning what happened, though not certainly. If it doesn't work that will mean I am effectively vanilla, and I will not contest being lynched at any point.
I will listen to other opinions, but goofy decides. Also, depending on what's happneing with the lynch you may want to give two options: what I should do if the reveal is villager and what I should do if it's wolf. And be sure that I'm not targeting anyone who is also being targeted by someone else (particularly slighted, obviously).
|
And if it's a neutral, like this post makes me think you are?
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 06:01 PM
|
#6003
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 7,557
|
Re: SE WW 4.0: The GOCB's vs the WANGZ
Quote:
Originally Posted by atakdog
I need to be gone for a while, but will be back for eod.
Goofy, I am going to let you direct my night action (if it exists). It is a power that, if it works, will be pretty bad for the target, so it needs not to be used on clear or likely villagers. If it works, it will probably be clear in the morning what happened, though not certainly. If it doesn't work that will mean I am effectively vanilla, and I will not contest being lynched at any point.
I will listen to other opinions, but goofy decides. Also, depending on what's happneing with the lynch you may want to give two options: what I should do if the reveal is villager and what I should do if it's wolf. And be sure that I'm not targeting anyone who is also being targeted by someone else (particularly slighted, obviously).
|
have you not used your NA yet? or are u saying that you became "active" recently or are possibly a backup...
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 06:02 PM
|
#6004
|
|
addicted
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: vṛkṣāsana
Posts: 45,796
|
Re: SE WW 4.0: The GOCB's vs the WANGZ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slighted
have you not used your NA yet? or are u saying that you became "active" recently or are possibly a backup...
|
The conditions required for me to use my action have been met. Specifically, I couldn't use it before night 5.
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 06:02 PM
|
#6005
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: lol goofybawler
Posts: 29,251
|
Re: SE WW 4.0: The GOCB's vs the WANGZ
Like the whole argument for me being neutral is just saying the perfectly logical argument that seers are theoretically bad for neutrals, fanmail has been an outed seer for days, they haven't killed fanmail or any other seers so they must not be too concerned with them, therefore they probably peek neutral. Why on earth would I be calling attention to this if I was a neutral?
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 06:03 PM
|
#6006
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,133
|
Re: SE WW 4.0: The GOCB's vs the WANGZ
Noze, it's tough to speculate about the win conditions of neutrals. Last game, i was a SK who desperately wanted to keep all of the seers alive (ducy?).
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 06:03 PM
|
#6007
|
|
addicted
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: vṛkṣāsana
Posts: 45,796
|
Re: SE WW 4.0: The GOCB's vs the WANGZ
Note, as goofy pointed out yesterday, that me having such a power in a game when I'm likely to be the subject of halfway rule discussion is basically being trolled by the rand.
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 06:06 PM
|
#6008
|
|
centurion
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 193
|
Re: SE WW 4.0: The GOCB's vs the WANGZ
Well it's a real shame but it looks like there will be no accuracy shooting competition this year!
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 06:06 PM
|
#6009
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Searching for my Canuck soulmate
Posts: 40,139
|
Re: SE WW 4.0: The GOCB's vs the WANGZ
Quote:
Originally Posted by atakdog
That was my thought. But fanmail's gambit looked like it got a village reaction.
But a neutral who knows he peeks vanilla village would react that way too.
nozecandy, btw.
|
Or a neutral who simply knows that the only other time fanmail peeked a neutral (Geddy) he was basically told (through his opposite mechanic) that he's a villager.
As for your proposal - I can give you a list of a few players by eod, but I don't think it's a good idea to be too explicit ITT about who you or slighted or anyone is targeting lest it let the wolves/neutrals play perfectly in response.
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 06:06 PM
|
#6010
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Searching for my Canuck soulmate
Posts: 40,139
|
Re: SE WW 4.0: The GOCB's vs the WANGZ
Pierre, are we supposed to 'in' individually for each event? I thought that since I was sleeping at 7am or whenever the hell signups were I was out for the day.
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 06:06 PM
|
#6011
|
|
journeyman
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: TAHRAHNNA!!!
Posts: 301
|
Re: SE WW 4.0: The GOCB's vs the WANGZ
*****GAME NOTE*****
EACH OF SATURDAY AND SUNDAY WILL BE SINGLE GAME DAYS WITH LYNCHES AT 6PM PST/9PM EST.
AND IF YOU NOTICE THAT THE MODS AREN'T AROUND, PLAYERS RUNNING THE VOTE COUNTER WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED.
Votes as of post 6009
Night in 02:54
---
| Votes | Lynch | Voters |
|---|
| 9 | Geddy Lee | zdye724 (19), Chilltown (38), Lin (14), mjw0586 (29), Nofear3838 (16), Nozecandy (30), Slighted (65), Steroid Boy (15), sylar (8) | | 2 | mjw0586 | Geddy Lee (37), vixticator (27) | | 2 | Nozecandy | atakdog (75), ItsRainingmen (37) | | 1 | ASPoker8 | goofyballer (41) | | 1 | atakdog | fanmail (54) | | 1 | unvote | schu_22 (17) | | 5 | not voting | g-bebe (9), ASPoker8 (6), Etats360 (7), Hold'em 07 (3), TJayBird (2) |
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 06:09 PM
|
#6012
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,133
|
Re: SE WW 4.0: The GOCB's vs the WANGZ
Players I think should be lynch targets ahead of me. I'M NOT BIASED IN ANY WAY, obviously.
zdye724
Lin
Nozecandy
sylar
Geddy Lee
atakdog
schu_22
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 06:09 PM
|
#6013
|
|
centurion
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 193
|
Re: SE WW 4.0: The GOCB's vs the WANGZ
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Pierre, are we supposed to 'in' individually for each event? I thought that since I was sleeping at 7am or whenever the hell signups were I was out for the day.
|
No it was for the entire competition and yes, unfortunately you missed out.
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 06:09 PM
|
#6014
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Searching for my Canuck soulmate
Posts: 40,139
|
Re: SE WW 4.0: The GOCB's vs the WANGZ
I guess this game is realistic with the east coast bias then
|
|
|
02-24-2012, 06:10 PM
|
#6015
|
|
addicted
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: vṛkṣāsana
Posts: 45,796
|
Re: SE WW 4.0: The GOCB's vs the WANGZ
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Or a neutral who simply knows that the only other time fanmail peeked a neutral (Geddy) he was basically told (through his opposite mechanic) that he's a villager.
As for your proposal - I can give you a list of a few players by eod, but I don't think it's a good idea to be too explicit ITT about who you or slighted or anyone is targeting lest it let the wolves/neutrals play perfectly in response.
|
I accept that, if you want to play it that way.
One possible problem is that anyone who might be targeted by me may want to claim to avoid it, and we don't want to smoke out too many power roles. But on balance you may be right.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:54 AM.
|