Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics)

02-16-2017 , 11:55 AM
Oh no, no more career politicians
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 11:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyB66
Do you think he would want to give up ownership of the Mavs?
Don't think he would have to.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 12:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwnsall
Oh no, no more career politicians
Great job, that's exactly what was being lamented

You're the best
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 12:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyB66
As long as you are consistent. All traitors get executed, or they don't. The fact that we can't execute a terrorist in this country, nobody is going to execute a government official over communication, regardless of the crimes.
oh ok so I didnt. so you are attributing arguments and opinions to me that I never said or even hinted.

so ya cool.

dont do that.

its called a strawman.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 12:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyB66
Do you think he would want to give up ownership of the Mavs?
If he has to, sure. He's not insane. George W Bush gave up control of the Rangers.

It's only Donny that doesn't see how there's a conflict of interest.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 12:55 PM
I think the only thing this whole experiment has confirmed is that every member of congress should have a term limit of exactly 1

Ryan now talking about how the leaks should be investigated. Not the president who may be in league with an enemy of the state but the people blowing the whistle on that. This is insanity
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 01:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StoppedRainingMen
I think the only thing this whole experiment has confirmed is that every member of congress should have a term limit of exactly 1

Ryan now talking about how the leaks should be investigated. Not the president who may be in league with an enemy of the state but the people blowing the whistle on that. This is insanity
I've thought this for a long time, at least for the Senate. I think either a single 8/10/12 year term is best with a proportional amount of seats turning over ever 2 years. So it would be 25%/20%/16.67% turnover every 2 years under this system.

As for the House I am a little more flexible. I'm not sure what to do there, but think a maximum time in office of 8-12 years seems quite reasonable too.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 01:16 PM
6 is the absolute max that any term should run at any level

If you want a longer time allowable, then let them have 2 terms

Don't think term limits are the panacea that many others think, tho
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 01:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PocketChads
6 is the absolute max that any term should run at any level

If you want a longer time allowable, then let them have 2 terms

Don't think term limits are the panacea that many others think, tho
Certainly not, but this is unacceptable
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 01:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PocketChads
6 is the absolute max that any term should run at any level

If you want a longer time allowable, then let them have 2 terms

Don't think term limits are the panacea that many others think, tho
Acting on things in a way that makes you more electable rather than acting for the best of the country and your constituents is a huge issue. What people say they want or vote on and what is best for them are often two very different things.

Also, experience matters and turnover hurts productivity. Not just in government, but in private industry or even personal life as well.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 01:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PocketChads
6 is the absolute max that any term should run at any level

If you want a longer time allowable, then let them have 2 terms

Don't think term limits are the panacea that many others think, tho
Hardly any downside though.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 01:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalledDownLight
Acting on things in a way that makes you more electable rather than acting for the best of the country and your constituents is a huge issue. What people say they want or vote on and what is best for them are often two very different things.

Also, experience matters and turnover hurts productivity. Not just in government, but in private industry or even personal life as well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by heh
Hardly any downside though.
This

One of the most destructive presidents in American history and potentially an actual honest to god traitor, has the legislative branch serving as enablers lest they lose their jobs instead of a check of his power

This isn't right
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 01:30 PM
Lol at the Congress enacting anything that limits their term length. It makes too much sense but the guys in power are never giving it up.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 01:32 PM
Not too long ago they voted to gut their own ethics enforcer. Insider trading IS LEGAL FOR CONGRESS. These clowns aren't going to do ****.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 01:37 PM
I mean, there are clearly downsides to term limits. Inexperience has a cost. Not caring what the electorate thinks of you, while good if you're principled, is dangerous if you're just there to get paid and/or **** **** up, like be spiteful towards other legislators or other branches. Don't like the President? Introduce a new bill to investigate or motion to impeach every day. Who cares if 70% of the electorate loves the President or whatever

This is just me going off the top of my head. Don't take my word for it. There's huge amounts of academic debate literally for centuries, with fair points on each side. "No downside to term limits" is pure reactionary hilarity. Recency bias, too. And I'm probably in favor of some form when the rubber hits the road
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 01:39 PM
The funny thing is I'm pretty sure one of the promises in that ethics list drumpf put out in the last week of the campaign was to force congress to enact term limits

Can someone repost that? I wanna chuckle at the great many things he'll never stick to that he probably will deny ever saying he wanted to do in the first place
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 01:44 PM
So say these investigations into these leaks are a "success." How is the end game not a bunch of career civil servants saying yes I leaked this info and risked my liberty because our President betrayed his country and shame on you for refusing to hold him accountable. You are all a disgrace to your office and to your country.

Is Trump just going to throw them all in Guantanamo or something?
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 01:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StoppedRainingMen
The funny thing is I'm pretty sure one of the promises in that ethics list drumpf put out in the last week of the campaign was to force congress to enact term limits

Can someone repost that? I wanna chuckle at the great many things he'll never stick to that he probably will deny ever saying he wanted to do in the first place
He definitely said "term limits" a lot. Not sure if it was enshrined in some formal promise tho

Last edited by PocketChads; 02-16-2017 at 02:00 PM.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 01:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalledDownLight
Acting on things in a way that makes you more electable rather than acting for the best of the country and your constituents is a huge issue. What people say they want or vote on and what is best for them are often two very different things.

Also, experience matters and turnover hurts productivity. Not just in government, but in private industry or even personal life as well.
what uhh do you think prevents politicians from completely deviating from campaign rhetoric when they are actually in office?

because i'm pretty sure it is threat of losing re-election. there is no incentive to do anything constitutents actually want once in office if we have one term people

now if you want to say that doesn't work out in practice than fine, but that is the idea behind it

Last edited by mutigers; 02-16-2017 at 01:56 PM. Reason: nvm already posted
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 02:46 PM
i just turned on the tv to this trump press conference. he is actually delusional. is this him cracking under pressure in real time? this is cringeworthy.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 02:48 PM
"reince is doing a phenomenal job" therefore fake news. fake news therefore we can't get things done. if not for fake news we'd be able to get things done. the russia thing is a ruse, the real story is leaks. ---actual paraphrasing of his scattered thoughts within a 5 min rant

'the public sees the bias and the hatred' (of fake news) actual quote
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 02:49 PM
100% no question trump is being blackmailed by the kgb. ok 99.5%.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 02:55 PM
trump enters/sets up every negotiation taking a hard line stance so he can get a better deal etc etc. (probably the only thing he's semi competent at). except when it comes to russia.


man he's loopy today.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 02:57 PM
he just said "i dont know, but i believe the [appellate] court has been overturned 80% of the time"
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
02-16-2017 , 02:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -Insert Witty SN-
100% no question trump is being blackmailed by the kgb. ok 99.5%.
Quote:
The Kremlin ordered state media to cut way back on their fawning coverage of President Donald Trump, reflecting a growing concern among senior Russian officials that the new U.S. administration will be less friendly than first thought, three people familiar with the matter said.

The order comes amid a growing chorus of anti-Russian sentiment in Washington, where U.S. spy and law-enforcement agencies are conducting multiple investigations to determine the full extent of contacts Trump’s advisers had with Russia during and after the 2016 election campaign.

Vladimir Putin’s administration justified the decision to curb coverage of Trump by saying that Russian viewers no longer find details of his transition to power interesting, according to one of the people. In reality, some of the most popular TV segments on Trump touched on ideas the Kremlin would rather not promote, such as his pledge to “drain the swamp,” the person said.

“They won’t pour buckets of criticism on Trump, they just won’t talk about him much,” Konstantin von Eggert, a political commentator for TV Rain, Russia’s only independent channel, said by phone. “The fate of Russia-American relations is much less predictable than it was just a few weeks ago.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...trump-coverage
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote

      
m