Quote:
Originally Posted by SirOsis
Is there something out there worth reading that could help me understand Trump's hard-on for coal?
Osis, it's about optics. A bunch of poor coal workers don't have jobs. If the mines are open for MOAR BUSINESS, then those people will have MOAR JOBS. Then news stories will say Trump is bringing employment back to coal workers, and therefore he's CREATING JOBS. Video of dirty dudes mining coal like orcs in Mordor will air on Fox and that will be great for Trump.
Restoring one of the dirtiest and most dangerous businesses ever is also a natural desire for anyone who wants to dismantle the administrative / regulatory state for the benefit of the oligarchic wealthy of the United States.
The purported theory is that environmental regulation has caused the reduction of jobs in that industry. That is partially, to a small degree, sort of true. That's as positively as one can fairly describe the veracity of the contention.
The conclusion these idiots draw from that contention, though, is that if they simply rescind those environmental regulations, the coal industry will be booming and jobs will be available. That is, according to virtually all experts, including one notable coal CEO who told Trump to "temper his expectations,"
not true. The jobs aren't coming back, for the following two reasons.
To a large degree, what has killed that industry is the fact that coal lost the cost battle to natural gas, and that problem was exacerbated by fracking. Now coal is relatively expensive and dirty and inefficient compared to natural gas, which is cheap, efficient, and relatively easy to produce, so demand for coal is lower. No one really wants it as much as other resources - the coal era is simply over as a matter of economics and technology.
And to a similar degree, the other thing that has killed that industry from a JOBS perspective is automation of most of the mining. That's got nothing to do with environmental regulation and everything to do with the fact that dudes working mines is inefficient and exceptionally dangerous,
before you factor in respiratory illness and deaths that are basically the birthright of every coal worker ever. Bigass machines dig holes and hack at coal and carry heavy-ass loads of coal better than puny humans do. And they cost way, way less. And you don't need to insure their health. And they don't unionize. This is not hard.
So anyway, Trump's coal fascination is about the optics of putting these guys back to work. It is in no way rationally tethered to the creation of jobs or to energy independence in America. Those are just talking points. It will create very few jobs, have middling impact on energy independence (like, virtually no impact other than tiny, tiny decimals on a spreadsheet deep in some pivot table quantifying energy demand), and, of course, be terrible for the environment for no gain other than stock footage of PEOPLE AT WORK.
And there you have your easy-to-read explanation of Trump's hard-on for coal.