Quote:
Originally Posted by aggo
those editorials are butthurt. they want to know how/why the WDA arrives to certain conclusions so that they can use it themselves and scrutinize it for whatever motives they have under the guise of "well we should know since this is kinda big deal"
good thing WDA is in the industry and not academia, or else nothing would ever get accomplished. Academia would argue for 10 years about the standard protocols for examining piss in an NMR, and by then, athletes wouldve already found drugs that the NMR can't differentiate from. and I'd be remiss that an athlete making 10+ million a year couldnt hire somebody to test his/her piss under the proper protocols to see what's turning up (and what isn't) if the WDA released their guidelines for how they test things.
right. the important thing is cracking down on these filthy cheaters, not making sure everything is all like accurate and stuff.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aggo
i dont know how the WDA arrives to it's conclusions, but if it's just like any industry in biotech, there is not one single scientist who gets to make a call on whether or not there is synthetic testosterone in piss.
yes i'm aware. i'll try not to use metaphors from now on.