Quote:
Originally Posted by CalledDownLight
I have read the espn article and a page of this thread and thats all. However, no one is saying that this guy could be innocent. This might be a correct view as its quite likely he is guilty, but it also seems troubling. Everyone is entitled their opinion, and mine is uninformed and thus nonexistent at this point, but I dont see why people feel the need to speculate or talk about it before the case goes to court. I think I'm unique, but I hate society convicting people outside of court.
Believing people are entitled to a day in court or the best defense available is separate from the question of whether something awful happened.
People don't get convicted outside of court. They may get judged.
There probably isn't a perjury case unless child molestation occurred. And if child molestation occurred it is tough to reconcile with appropriate administration-- whether or not the administrators committed perjury.
Your love of reasonable doubt, innocent until proven guilty, etc., these are apparently your hobby horses for empty prattle. Really aren't adding anything.