In case you not aware (and it seems that way), you're not required by law to respond to every single post or PM that references you in some way.
Let's practice right now. Don't quote or respond to this post. I know you're going to want to to the point that your OCD will kick in and you might not be able to help it, but with some will power, you might be able to overcome.
Sorry, I'm nobody's bitch, Bitchface. If you'd like to advise me of something that bothers you, fine. This is the thread to confirm you're mad.
However, I'm not going to follow some arbitrary rule you are trying to impose just because u mad.
I know you're scared about what will happen if you don't respond to every single post. But you can train yourself to fight it.
Doctor: "So, Oski, what brings you here today?"
Oski: "Well, a guy who's mad about something told me to seek help because I respond to internet messages that address me by name."
Doctor: "you mean Bitchface? Lol, he was just here. He was pretty mad, by the way. When it comes to rectal exams, let's just say, he's no longer untouchable."
Re: Other than Oski & Thundercat, who are the mad SE p0sters? - sponsored by kkf
Quote:
Originally Posted by C-Viggity
Oski,
I'd seriously suggest a week or two away from 2p2
As in "you would seriously suggest" it if someone happened to care enough to ask?
Anyhow, I do appreciate your hypothetical concern, and after my crushing victory in exposing mods-gone-wild, a vacation does sound like a good idea. However, I realize I spent most of my posting time over the last week fighting that injustice and I need to catch up with the threads. I am thinking of going over to POG to learn how to play werewolf. I hear it's "da bomb."
Re: Other than Oski & Thundercat, who are the mad SE p0sters? - sponsored by kkf
the world of form arises from the mind of oski man we all arise from that same mind but in that moment of the other well oski himself (a conventional term in fact its devoid of self) arises as do the more singular dhammas that encompass we in anattas mind right now as he types the world of form arises from his anattas mind right now present moment no his though
Re: Other than Oski & Thundercat, who are the mad SE p0sters? - sponsored by kkf
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitchface
Oski,
Serious question: Are you able to sleep at night if you read someone on the Internet reference you in a post without responding to it?
Of course. I will reveal that page of my playbook to you:
1. Questions or posts directed to me by name: Respond to said post within a reasonable time, if possible.
2. Posts that reference me by name: Strong bias towards responding. If response is warranted, proceed under section "1."
3. Posts that reference me by implication: Bias towards responding, but weighted against my personal interest in the subject matter and intentions of poster. Respond whenever you feel like doing so.
That's pretty much it. My rules for internet post response pretty much embrace my real-life policy of responding to people that address me, whether it by on the telephone, in person, by text message, e-mail, etc. There are flaws in this system, sure, but it pretty much minimizes the chances of having to witness people talking to themselves.
Re: Other than Oski & Thundercat, who are the mad SE p0sters? - sponsored by kkf
I took a look at this thread and considered putting Oski's name in the title. Then I saw it already was in the title, and realized I had to update it with the latest chapter. I did bold one part that particularly amused me.
Enjoy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oski
It was me. I am not a banned poster, why can't I continue on under a new name?
After getting banned for posting in the Paterno thread, I figured rather than complain about it, it would be better to ignore it and move on.
By no means does anyone want to go back trough that, because my banning there was complete bull****.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClarkNasty
I honestly didn't care who it was. Low post count handles that come in and add nothing but noise, and obviously know the forum are getting nuked on sight, no questions asked.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oski
Well, you need to start asking questions.
I guess your new policy is to ban people for making the same posts you do; especially when you troll them and they come back at you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nutshot2
Lol Oski gtfo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oski
U gtfo. Nut Low is a great name and I was planning to build it up. How do you get to 10,000 posts if you can't be allowed to make it past 20?
Interestingly enough, before people "got suspicious" nobody complained about Nut Low's posting and many seemed to enjoy it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClarkNasty
Lol yes, his 18 posts built a huge following. Lolol
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oski
I'm not a banned poster. Why couldn't I retire my Oski account and go on as Nut Low (which, apparently is an appropriate name).
You didn't do the same thing? (except for actually being Nut Low without actually calling yourself that).
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClarkNasty
Hey, by all means, I am happy to retire Oski for you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oski
Do it then. You are a coward in everything else you do in your life. Do something for once by God!.
You are a completely one-eyed, uninteresting person and poster. The only reason why anyone cares about what you do here is because you are a mod and apparently suck up to people in real life. It must be real cool to ban people because you can't handle your own business otherwise.
You came at me for "legal tarding" the PSU thread when at that point there were 1,200 posts in the thread and I made 3 related to the law (and those were in response to a question). At the point you accused me of "legal tarding" you had at least 10 posts stating your own opinion on the law. I don't get it. Your subsequent posts had healthy amounts of "legal tarding" and the same sorts of comments you banned others for. Anyhow, good for you, Jack.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyleb
ONE TIME CLARK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oski
Yeah, ONE TIME. Because none of you little men ever took me down on your own. Always had to go crying to a mod or a pack of other little men to try and get me. You never did. So, ban me ... because you never will.
Little pea-brained posters and mods alike take their potshots and then when big daddy strikes them down, they have to go the infraction route.
It would have been better to keep me here so that maybe one day, someone could actually come at me and handle themselves. I never came after anyone, but I have had people gunning for me all the time. They all lose and then call for their mommy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman
Oski,
You seem legitimately crazy. Take the time off to reflect on why you wrote tens of thousands of words in a private message exchange with a moderator on an internet message board.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oski
No need to reflect on it. I did it for personal gratification in that I friggin' DESTROYED him.
He was so stupid, he posted in public and I got double value and proved that he was wrong the whole time.
So take some time off to figure out why you made such a profoundly stupid post in my direction.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oski
I'll make you a deal. All of you. I will post in the "ban me thread" in "about the forums" and that will get rid of me for good.
In return, we have a no-holds barred thread where I will answer any and all questions truthfully and completely, including my honest opinions on posters, mods, life, P.O.T., etc.
If you want it, you got it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oski
Well, you failed the forum then. Nut Low made 12 SE posts in about 10 days. Oski (who is considered a bag of poo) made that many in an hour.
If what most say is true, you would want less of me, not more.
As deniro says in "cop land"."YOU BLEW IIIIIT! You had you chance, but YOU BLEW IIIIIT!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oski
You specifically invited discussion on this banning in your triumphant "I banned Oski" announcement. You did say the discussion should go in the Faq thread, but I don't want to clutter it.
Suffice it to say, you could not justify the banning on the basis you state. I would easily prove you wrong.
The baby-boy Karak who reported, actually came at this bro for no reason. 1300 posts into that thread (with only a handful being mine) Karak trolled me like the punk he is and I had not come close to being hostile or disrespectful to anyone.(Interestingly enough he had his post erased after I got banned. Nice.)
After that, little men came after me with their little potshots and I merely responded. I even bowed out of the thread for a day, but returned when I saw how boring it was in my absence.
This is why I decided that Nut Low was the answer, as Oski, just appearing in a thread constitutes "trolling" under your new MicroClark standards. I was saving myself, you, the forum and the internet with my sacrificial move to Nut Low.
Alas, now Nut Low is High and Dry.
Anyhow, as far as Oski goes, if people abided by the rules and didn't troll me endlessly by taking their little potshots at me, I wouldn't go after them. It's that simple. Go show me an instance where I attacked someone without getting attack. If you don't come at me, I get along fine with everyone. Just ask my grandson Spaulding! He and I are regular pals.
Two Plus Two
Linear Mode
