Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada

04-27-2016 , 12:44 PM
btw, SUNRISE CATZ logo leaked

Spoiler:


I approve
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-27-2016 , 07:49 PM
Fingers crossed that Guy and the rest of the DCDLS group are announced as the front-runners to build an arena and re-develop a portion of downtown Ottawa tomorrow. Would be pretty much force Eugene to sell the team.
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-27-2016 , 11:26 PM
late to the party but whats up
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-28-2016 , 12:37 PM
Happy to see the Kesler era in Anaheim is going as well as I had hoped
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-28-2016 , 12:41 PM
No idea who I'd pick with 4th overall. Tough spot.
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-28-2016 , 01:55 PM
draft #hottaking beginning

the Oracle Big Bobby Mack wrote some stuff yesterday...

Quote:
At face value, nothing has changed from TSN's Mid-Season NHL draft rankings. Matthews is still No. 1; Laine is still No. 2.

But when 10 NHL scouts were surveyed by TSN in late January/early February, all 10 had Matthews at No. 1. This time, in a survey of the same 10 scouts – conducted in the run-up to Saturday's NHL draft lottery – two of the 10 said Laine is now No. 1 on their team's lists. Others suggested they had to think long and hard about their decision to keep Matthews at No. 1.
a center heavy team binking 1 should be fun

Quote:
The scouts surveyed said they will be watching with great interest the upcoming IIHF World Championship tourney, May 6 - 22 in Russia. Matthews has already been named to Team USA's roster. Laine is expected to be named to Finland's team.


Quote:
Puljujarvi remains entrenched at No. 3 – nine of 10 surveyed this week had him there; one scout ranked him second overall.

What's clear now, as it was in early February, is that the Big Three is indeed the Big Three. No prospect outside of Matthews and the two Finns was ranked in the top three on any of the 10 scouts' lists.

One scout said he allows for the possibility some NHL team may have someone other than Matthews, Laine and Puljujarvi in its top three, but is skeptical.

"I'm not sure anyone picking in the top three needs to overthink this," the scout said.
Spoiler:


Quote:
London Knight winger Matthew Tkachuk is No. 4, followed by Cape Breton Screaming Eagle winger Pierre-Luc Dubois at No. 5 and Mississauga Steelhead winger Alex Nylander at No. 6.
Canucks totally gonna get 4 and take Tkachuk ugh

Quote:
Only two of the 10 scouts surveyed by TSN had a defenceman in their top five – one had Sarnia Sting blueliner Jakob Chychrun, a U.S.-born dual citizen who represents Canada internationally, at No. 4 and another had London Knight Olli Juolevi, a Finn, at No. 5. Only two other scouts had a defenceman in their top six.

Juolevi checked in at No. 7 overall, followed by Russian Mikhail Sergachev of the Windsor Spitfires at No. 8 and Sarnia's Chychrun at No. 9. They are the top three d-men in this draft.

Two more defencemen – Canadian Jake Bean of the Calgary Hitmen, an offensive blueliner, and American Charlie McAvoy of Boston University, a puck mover who can be effective on the power play – were ranked in the Top 15 of the Lottery Edition. Bean was No. 12 and McAvoy No. 14.

Chychrun was the only defenceman to be ranked in anyone's top four prospects. One scout had him at No. 4 overall. But only four of the 10 scouts surveyed had him in their Top 10; six had him ranked 11th or lower. Worth noting, though, is that of the four scouts who ranked Chychrun in the Top 10, all four viewed him as the best defenceman in the draft.

In contrast, Juolevi’s highest rank was No. 5 overall, but nine of 10 scouts had him in their top 10. Two scouts had him ranked as the top D-man in the draft.

Sergachev’s highest rank was No. 6; seven of 10 scouts had him in their Top 10 but only two ranked him as the top defenceman in the draft.

Bean got two votes in the top 10 and McAvoy only one; Bean was viewed as the top defenceman in the draft by one scout.

Penticton Vees' defenceman Dante Fabbro, who played for Canada at the World U-18 Championship in Grand Forks, didn't quite make the cut for TSN's Top 15, but he did get one vote in the Top 10 (No. 5) and was deemed the top defenceman by that one scout. It’s another good example of the divergence of opinion on this year's blueline prospect pool.
draft should be pretty popcorn this year after the top-3

Quote:
Two American forwards – centre Clayton Keller of the U.S. National Development Team Program at No. 10 and Windsor Spitfire centre Logan Brown at No. 13 – are big risers from the mid-season to draft lottery rankings.

Keller is a smallish but gifted offensive centre with elite creativity; Brown is a 6-foot-6 pro-style centre who put up good numbers in Windsor and improved as the season wore on. Keller had five votes in the Top 10; Brown had four.

The Canadian equivalent of Keller and Brown – a prospect whose stock is trending up – is Penticton Vee centre Tyson Jost, who broke Connor McDavid’s Canadian scoring record at the World U-18 Championship. Jost was No. 13 at mid-season and has moved up two spots to No. 11.

Keller, Jost and Brown have moved up, quite possibly, at the expense of Mississauga Steelhead centre Michael McLeod, who is ranked 15th on TSN's Draft Lottery Edition. The hard-driving Canadian pivot was No. 9 at mid-season.

The 6-foot-2 centre projects to have NHL size and speed and he plays the game extremely hard, but scouts have expressed some concern about his offensive productivity at the next level. His fall from TSN's Top 10 was one of the more surprising developments; only one of 10 scouts had him as a Top 10 pick this time around.
think Keller & Jost probably have the best chance to leap up into the top-10. Keller looks pretty dynamic in a Kane/Gaudreau way, and TSN spent that U18 tournament trying to turn Jost into Toews. only takes 1 team to believe...

Quote:
Originally Posted by thedeezy
late to the party but whats up
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-28-2016 , 02:03 PM
that was getting a little long, so conclusion/summary in a 2nd post

http://www.tsn.ca/laine-closes-gap-o...kings-1.478128

Quote:
If this draft looks like it has a lot of uncertainty and fluidity, it's because there is. If there's a given, perhaps it's that the Big Three of Matthews, Laine and Puljujarvi are highly likely to go one-two-three on draft day.

TSN's consensus shows the next prospect "layer" to include the three wingers – Tkachuk, Dubois and Nylander – but there are two things worth mentioning here: 1. Personal preference will dictate what order they're taken; and 2. It is by no means out of the question that any one of a cache of five or six defencemen could supplant one (or more?) of the wingers in the four-to-six range. That's really where things will get interesting.

As noted, there's a high degree of personal preference for the available blueliners – Juolevi, Sergachev, Chychrun, Bean, McAvoy and even Fabbro.

And while one or more of the defenceman could jump up into that second layer of prospects behind the Big Three, the reality is the next layer of forwards – starting with Keller at 10, Jost at 11, Brown at 13 and McLeod at 15 – are all viable Top 10 candidates who could also push some of the defencemen further down the list.

It should not be lost on anyone that the four forwards currently ranked between 10 and 15 are all centers, which of course is a premium position. The only other centre ranked higher than Keller, Jost, Brown and McLeod is Matthews, at No. 1.

This is the type of draft, outside of the top four or five or six, where positional preference could come into play earlier than usual because there isn't a lot separating those prospects who would otherwise be considered “best available.” Also, every prospect currently ranked between No. 7 and No. 15 is either a defenceman or a centre.
feel like most drafts have more certainty than this, so dis should be good

tier 1: big-3
tier 2: wingerz
tier 3: centers & d

feels likely that things could start to get wild in that 4-6 range when there's teams that don't want a winger, either trading down, or yoloing on their fav C/D from lower down. and to see what order these guys start going in. could easily make a case for each of Tkachuk, Dubois, or Nylander being the best of that group. or between Chychrun, Juolevi, Sergachev (or even Mcavoy, Bean, Fabbro, etc apparently). Mcleod will probably get squeezed by Keller, Jost & Brown, but i still think he's a good player and will likely be solid value for someone at 12-15.

the only thing i know for certain is that every team will be claiming that they got their guy, couldn't believe he was still there. and this time around it might not be a lie.
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-28-2016 , 02:47 PM
one other thing i really want to see is the Coyotes NOT bink #1, or even top-3, then see just how badly they want Matthews to ride in and save their franchise. for whatever reason Ekman-Larsson has seemingly been available on the trade block for years, so i wonder if they'd actually trade him and the 7th/8th pick for #1. there's a few teams like Edmonton & Vancouver who might be interesting in trading down if it means they can land a star dman that can be plugged right into the lineup, and still get a good prospect of their choice at 7/8.

so like with the Canucks for example, Ekman-Larsson fills an obvious need on the blueline, and then say maybe they really like Tyson Jost as a future center. remember, Jost is headed to North Dakota to play with their maybe their top forward prospect, winger Brock Boeser, next season. hmm...

similar thing for the Oilers, though i could see them just drafting another dman at 7/8 because of how great a need it is. would give them 1 for now, and 1 for later.

is it insanity to trade out of this top-3, especially #1?
do guys like Benning/Chiapet have the [???] to do it?
probably not
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-28-2016 , 03:01 PM
Eugene Melnyk's RendezVous Lebreton bid was just chosen as the preferred proposal for Lebreton Flats redevelopment.

Lots of work to go until we know about an arena downtown, but it's definitely moving that way.

A downtown Ottawa arena, where things should have been 25 years ago.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-28-2016 , 03:36 PM
The reverse-implied odds of trading out of this top 3 are way too high for anyone that doesn't own the franchise they're managing to even consider imo.

Thank god Lindenning don't have enough money to buy this sad team of ours.
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-28-2016 , 04:03 PM
Little Caesars Arena

Illitch has officially lost it
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-28-2016 , 04:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamSchwartz
The reverse-implied odds of trading out of this top 3 are way too high for anyone that doesn't own the franchise they're managing to even consider imo.
should be able to pick protect like basketball. trade 1st round for your 1st+2nd...with caveat if either team is top 3, then no dice...or it would have to be 1st round from 2017
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-28-2016 , 05:01 PM
pretty sure they do that already?
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-28-2016 , 05:06 PM
yeah, the 1st the Pens traded to the Leafs for Kessel was lottery protected, for example
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-28-2016 , 05:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjw0586
Little Caesars Arena

Illitch has officially lost it
Close, but Smoothie King Center still reigns supreme as worst-named building in pro-sports
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-28-2016 , 07:35 PM
.
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-28-2016 , 07:41 PM
beating the crowd and getting in here early, Karak knows

NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-29-2016 , 02:12 PM
Ducks fire BigBruce because of the large sample size they have of losing game 7's.

Let the GM button-mashing begin!
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-29-2016 , 02:12 PM
Boudreau fired. Checked his wiki.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Boudreau

Says his favourite player is Erik Karlsson. Not sure if that's a recent fan troll edit cause rumors sens are interested.

edit: lol x-post on hour old info.
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-29-2016 , 02:47 PM
seeing as how losing in G7 would be a massive step up for the Sens, they might as well take a run at BRUUUUUCE. plus Karlsson would have a perma-greenlight, so let's make it so.

who else still needs a coach?
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-29-2016 , 03:35 PM
Bruce won't last long.


Ran the simulator 10 times. 4 - 1st's and 6 - 4th's. Firstly what are the odds of that? Not good I assume. Secondly I am gonna be sooooo choked when we finish 4th. You just know it's going to happen.
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-29-2016 , 03:41 PM
Bob Mac said maybe Minnesota but Ottawa is most likely.
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-29-2016 , 03:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Mantis_
ODDZ

top-3 vs 4 basically a flip for the Laffs, gl
LOiLers 60% not top-3 LOCK top-3 ldo
Canucks 66% NOT top-3 ugh
37% chance that a team outside the worst 5 will snag #1

reality: everyone has a pretty good chance of dropping, so yeah whoever lands in the top-3 will have to consider themselves pretty lucky. i mean it's kinda tilting to run that thing and the top-3 is like Flames / Sabres / Avs or whatever. could easily happen. at least 1 team getting real lucky probably will happen.

95% of ppl prolly gonna be on lifetilt tomorrow...
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-29-2016 , 04:48 PM
why on earth would bruce go to the sens? he can afford to wait for a good situation, and ottawa's the polar opposite of that.
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote
04-29-2016 , 05:25 PM
what good situation is about to fire their coach
NHL Offseason Thread 2016: Sponsored, once again, by LolCanada Quote

      
m