Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Sports and Games > Sporting Events

Notices

Sporting Events Discussion centered around sporting events.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2008, 04:34 PM   #796
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Assani Fisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 39,194
Re: NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SarcasticRat View Post
Nope.

But I definitely agree with what you're saying. Us young kids are at a pretty big disadvantage, even though (afaik) we're both huge sports nuts. I've never seen a lot of these players play so it's pretty hard to compare them to guys I see every week now.

Also, I love the Moss pick. No WR can just flat out change a game like he can, and yes that includes Jerry Rice.
Some of Jerry Rice's game records:

Receiving touchdowns in a game (5)-tied with 2 others
Only player to record 5 touchdowns & 200+ yards receiving in the same game: 10/14/90
Only player to record 5 touchdowns, 200+ yards from scrimmage, & 10+ receptions in the same game: 10/14/90
Only player to record 280+ yards receiving & 10+ yards rushing in the same game: 12/18/95
Only player to record 280+ yards receiving & 3+ touchdowns in a single game: 12/18/95
Only player to record 299+ yards from scrimmage & 3+ touchdown receptions in the same game: 12/18/95
Only player with 16+ receptions and 3+ touchdown receptions in the same game; 11/20/94



Games with at least 100 yards receiving (76)
Games with at least 150 yards receiving (30)
Games with at least 225 yards receiving (3)
Games with at least 150 yards receiving in a single season (5)
Games with 10+ receptions & 140+ receiving yards (13)
Games with at least 1 touchdown (145)
Games with at least 1 touchdown reception (139)
Games with at least 2 touchdowns (45)
Games with at least 2 touchdown receptions (43)
Games with at least 3 touchdowns (14)
Games with at least 3 touchdown receptions (11)



edited to add: This has nothing to do with my point, but I found it interesting....He is currently the only player in the post NFL/AFL merger era to gain a single-season major offensive title with an output double that of the number two man. His 22 touchdown catches in 1987 were twice that of Player X's 11.
Assani Fisher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 04:41 PM   #797
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
SarcasticRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sucking at Reverse Sheep
Posts: 7,105
Re: NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread

I mean obviously Rice is unbelievable, but he tended to score in a more systematic fashion. IMO an 80 yard bomb to Moss is more crippling than Rice just catching everything. But I'm not sure how relevant that is anyways. I mean I obviously can't get in the heads of NFL players, but I imagine it'd suck for a team to get a great drive and score only to have Moss get a monster TD and have to start over again.
SarcasticRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 04:43 PM   #798
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
SMIGLET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CUTLUH CUTLUH CUTLUH CUTLUH CUTLUH
Posts: 12,462
Re: NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread

took walter jones, summary in draft thread
SMIGLET is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 04:45 PM   #799
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Assani Fisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 39,194
Re: NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread

Jones wasn't who I was thinking of, but then again I really can't rate o-linemen very well
Assani Fisher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 04:46 PM   #800
Mularkey for Barkley
 
Needle77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Above the Mason Dixon Line
Posts: 35,540
Re: NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread

Obviously my rankings are going to be different mostly because of the style of offense that I will be running compared to what the vast majority looks to be running(right now actually on the offensive side of the ball I can say that I'm the only one that is running the offense I plan on).

It's just that I was positive that #1 was consensus, Walter Jones was not one of the two that was missing from my top 4.
Needle77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 04:48 PM   #801
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Dudd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,441
Re: NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread

Rice could definitely take it to the house from anywhere on the field, it just was more likely to be a 15 yard slant followed by a broken tackle rather than simply outjumping someone 50 yards downfield.
Dudd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 04:51 PM   #802
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
MacGuyV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Passyunk
Posts: 20,166
Re: NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Zoidberg View Post
The problem I have with taking Moss in the 1st is that he is now your most talented player in the locker room by far and thus has no one to keep his ego in check. (Does Moss know that he's your first round pick in our league?) In Minnesota and New England he had someone above him on the totem pole who could keep him in line. Here, it's gonna be hard to find a player who commands Moss' respect and forces to cut the bull****.
I'd agree w/ that completely. Chad Pennington (former college teammate) basically said as much when he signed w/ NE: "He'll be great there because there are players on that team better than him".
MacGuyV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 04:54 PM   #803
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
Dudd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 30,441
Re: NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread

Moss set all sorts of I-AA records in college, and he was clearly the best player on the team, having originally gone to FSU as a big time recruit. Just because he pouted when Andrew Walters was his qb doesn't mean that he'll do it for whoever ends up being selected in this draft.
Dudd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 04:55 PM   #804
old hand
 
Dr. Zoidberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,583
Re: NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Assani Fisher View Post
Just to be clear....

We're talking about the same Bill Belichick who only had one .500 or better season out of 5 in Cleveland, right? The same Bill Belichick who went 5-11 in his first year with the Pats? The same Bill Belichick who was 0-2 with Drew Bledsoe as his starter in 2001 before Drew got hurt? The same Bill Belichick whose team was a double digit underdog in week 3 and whose team was generally thought of to be the worst in the league(look it up, thats not hyperbole)?

Then Tom Brady took over, the Pats went 11-3 in the rest of the regualar season, they won the SB, they formed a dynasty, and then everyone started calling Belichick a great coach. But I"m sure thats just a total coincidence, right? It always takes coaches 6 years and an 0-2 start in the 7th year before truly showing how great they are, right?
Also, the same Bill Belichick who had two rings on his hand before he ever met Tom Brady. Or the same Bill Belichick who had the #1 defense in 1994. Or the same Bill Belichick who Robert Kraft gave up a #1 pick to acquire. (We can do this all day.)

I don't even know what you're arguing. Brady and Moss make each other better. Manning and undrafted WR make each other better. Brady and Belichick make each other better. I already stated that Brady was #2 on my board. I consider Manning/Brady/Marino neck and neck with Montana/Young right behind them. Maybe I mistook the tone of the post, but you seemed to argue that Brady has been at a huge disadvantage compared to Manning throughout his career. I don't see it. The coaching talent between New England and the Colts is just as important as whatever talent gap there was between Manning's surrounding cast and Brady's.

It's not just Belichick either. Are you seriously arguing that Brady doesn't benefit from being molded by an organization where the head coach, offensive coordinator, and defensive coordinator have 5 rings between them before he was even on the team? Belichick isn't infallible. He got outcoached by Coughlin. He made some mistakes in Cleveland that he obviously learned from. But top to bottom, the New England Patriots have been the best run organization in all of football since Belichick was hired.
Dr. Zoidberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 04:58 PM   #805
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
MacGuyV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Passyunk
Posts: 20,166
Re: NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread

Favre is a solid pick. I thought he'd go too low and be a rare product of the backwards "recent player bias". The idea of him throwing games away is fresh in all of our minds because sports are everywhere online now, but damn his playoff performances were insanely good pre-Atlanta '02.
MacGuyV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 05:00 PM   #806
veteran
 
SHARK DOCTOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wheres Waldo aint got chit on me!
Posts: 3,297
Re: NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread

Correction: I will be taking Moss from the 2003 season with the Vikings. That was the year he caught 111 receptions for 1600+ yards and 17 TDs...and was already known as a deep threat and was not playing alongside [TARD]...thus demanding heavy double teams. He definitly had his ball catching radar on full, and was familiar with all the little tricks by then.

Last edited by SHARK DOCTOR; 10-07-2008 at 05:15 PM. Reason: tarded out a players name...thnx Bobbo for the subtle headsup
SHARK DOCTOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 05:02 PM   #807
veteran
 
SHARK DOCTOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wheres Waldo aint got chit on me!
Posts: 3,297
Re: NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Zoidberg View Post
The problem I have with taking Moss in the 1st is that he is now your most talented player in the locker room by far and thus has no one to keep his ego in check. (Does Moss know that he's your first round pick in our league?) In Minnesota and New England he had someone above him on the totem pole who could keep him in line. Here, it's gonna be hard to find a player who commands Moss' respect and forces to cut the bull****.
Who says your lesser talented players cant be huge locker room presence type of guys? The draft is still young...there are a lot of guys still available that will be considered great leaders...btw - Moss leads by example.
SHARK DOCTOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 05:08 PM   #808
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
BobboFitos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Queens Park
Posts: 41,814
Re: NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread

I know who needle's #1 is, and i too am perplexed he's still around.

also, someone said moss can impact the game even more then rice... meh. both are just freaks and amazing. rice does have longevity, professionalism, and consistency over moss tho.
BobboFitos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 05:10 PM   #809
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
DCIAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,237
Re: NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread

Favre is so underrated on this board. Steve Young (while a better pick for this purpose if you can just cherry-pick 1994, I guess) being a great pick at #6, while Favre is a "meh, I guess you have to" at #19 is just insane.

*snip* FAVRE GUD YOUNG OVERRATED *snip*

Last edited by DCIAce; 10-07-2008 at 05:25 PM. Reason: roundabout name-hinting replaced by what I was really getting at by using "Steve Young Lite" as an example :p
DCIAce is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 05:12 PM   #810
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
BobboFitos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Queens Park
Posts: 41,814
Re: NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread

just want to point out most of you are tards and keep mentioning players. the guy who lined up on the other side of moss, the guy who was on moss's team for a little bit and has had injury problems,..
BobboFitos is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive