Quote:
Originally Posted by andyhop
Butler is a harder choice because there hasn't been any indication that he wants to leave, so trading him for someone who might in a best case scenario be as good as him now in 5 years time makes a lot less sense
pretty clear that Jimmy does not love the Bulls and would happily go
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcb33f
nothing wrong with it imo. nba is an entertainment product, placating the media is a worthwhile move. it mostly only matters for players who are already mega rich anyway
did they pick the most best and quite important the most entertaining players?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kowabunghole
Third team seems so mediocre aren't there better players than derozan and Jordan
certainly and all nba should be 15 guys regardless of position
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffRas22
Boston getting Hayward would be awesome. He's so perfect for them. IT/Bradley/Hayward/Crowder/Horford with Fultz as a super 6th man is dope.
crowdwer is 6'5 with a 6'9 wingspan
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirOsis
I guess ATL wanted to talk to Olshey about their GM job but POR adamantly said no. LOL Hawks.
blazers r ruined for 12+ years
Quote:
Originally Posted by capone0
4 #1s seems like a deal but if you have George and ATL's current roster, you'd assume they'd probably be in the bottom 8 in the first round of the draft for much of the period of the 1st rounders. Is it the NBA when you can't trade multiple first rounders in a row or would the trade before 4 straight 1st rounders?
if they actually wanted PG, why trade Korver?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jh12547
Crowder and the 1 for Porzingis would be great imo
great for boston, relegation worthy for NYK