Quote:
Originally Posted by Kneel B4 Zod
I have zero opinion on any of these guys, but frankly I think that's the right way to think about it (in a hugely uncertain projection environment, just take the average of what everybody else thinks). Unless you are dealing with a LeBron/Tim Duncan can't miss type, and there are very few of those.(I don't think anyone is putting Fultz in that class). Short of that, I doubt there is a major difference in EV in going down two draft slots. The #3 guy projects a bit worse than this year's #1 guy, but you throw another nice dart next year or the year after where maybe you can get a Jimmy Butler or Paul George or Kawhi etc etc
the average of what everybody thinks is that fultz is just a notch or two below the lebron/duncan tier and whoever they get at #3 and the LAL/SAC pick will be extremely distant from that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by capone0
Now that I'm reading there are 3-4 top flight prospects next year (Porter, Doncic, Ayton, Bamba) and a few the year after (Bagley, Zion, Reddish)--I'm reading Bagley is the best prospect in 10 years.....seems crazy after all the hype coming with Zion. I think Fultz > Jackson but if fit isn't right and you're going to get value in almost all situations in the future, doesn't seem like a bad trade. Honestly seems like a pretty awesome trade for both teams. Philly finally cashing in some of it's chips; they can only have so many rookies/young players on the squad and Boston getting some chips for 2 good drafts.
the only thing that is good about 2018 is that luka doncic is the best prospect since lebron.
unfortunately he is slated to go #1 and the Celtics can't get #1 with the LAL pick. then the NCAA class is completely mediocre at the top with nobody looking special.
2019 who knows it's too far away. Bagley prob not a goat tho his AAU team sucks.