Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitchface
I mean, have you been watching him play? It's not like you could just dismiss it as a lucky year or something. The guy has played like no person I've ever seen before. That's enough for me to call him a GOAT. I don't know why he has to do it for 3 years or something. What's the difference?
EDIT: It's also not like he came out of nowhere. He was recognized as very, very good for the last few years now.
You're an idiot.
Played like no person you've seen ... you either never saw Federer at his peak or are just too ******ed to have understood what you were watching.
Federer is 30, yet he still managed to beat your "GOAT" at the French and came within a hair of beating him again at the US open.
Just amazing how people are pissing all over Federer now that he's 30 and has lost a step.