Quote:
Originally Posted by gusmahler
His point is simple--how valuable can you be if your team is in last? Replace Arod with the worst SS in baseball and guess what? The team is still in last place.
|
This is still just bad logic. For instance, in a theoretical league you could have 5 teams in the GOAT division with 120 wins, 115 wins, 110 wins, 109, and 108--and the 108 let's say has Bonds in his prime. Just because he is in a tough division or his team isn't that great with respect to division record does not make him extremely valuable. Wins/team are most times way overrated in MVP voting. Basically many people think MVP = Best Player on a great team which isn't the true definition.