Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
MLB Season Thread 2017 MLB Season Thread 2017
View Poll Results: Who's shipping it?
Chicago Cubs
15 19.74%
Boston Red Sox
6 7.89%
Cleveland Indians
7 9.21%
Los Angeles Dodgers
6 7.89%
Washington Nationals
5 6.58%
San Francisco Giants
3 3.95%
Houston Astros
5 6.58%
New York Mets
0 0%
Toronto Blue Jays
3 3.95%
Other
26 34.21%

07-20-2017 , 11:31 PM
Segura career .118 with 0 HRs with bases loaded. Could be the worst numbers ive seen for that situation.
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-20-2017 , 11:36 PM
What odds do you need on the Dodgers, down 6-1 at home in the middle of the 5th?
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-20-2017 , 11:56 PM
Visiting the in-laws in Chicago in September and just booked tickets for all 3 Friday-Sunday games at Wrigley vs the Cardinals. Today was a good day.
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-20-2017 , 11:57 PM
Awesome. You do live in the US now right?
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 01:01 AM
Really great catch by Camargo to end the Dodgers streak.
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 01:05 AM
no surprise the dodgers lose the same day the wet blanket rbk shows up
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 01:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGame18
This is Ellsbury bro. You make it sound like he's never been hurt before lol. Planning for him to be hurt going forward seems pretty reasonable to me.

Hunter Greene is probably 3-4 years away. Does that make him expendable too?
My point isn't player specific. One of your arguments of keeping a blue-chipish type player was the organizational depth you have in case **** happens to a player.

To make this simple you need to only answer one question; what should the goal be for the rest of the season.

The plan coming out of Spring Training was no expectations whatsoever, let the kids develop and see what they got which as a fan I'm 100% behind because there was no pressure, and no need to win this year. Now were 11 days away from the deadline, you look and see your in a playoff spot at present, so you ask the question again and they answered YES were going for it.

I posted this in the STT thread a couple of weeks ago if they are going to go for it don't trade anything high valued, which imo I deemed as Torres, and Frazier as untouchable. Regardless since they are going for it, should you really worry about the WHAT IF an injury happens, no you assess your needs, look at your assets, and make a deal. Am I really concerned if Ellsbury slips and breaks his vagina...not on 7/20...and if I'm Cashman that can't be a consideration at the deadline to improve the team.



Quote:
Originally Posted by AGame18
Not sure why you're making Torres/Frazier/Mateo the holy grail. Rutherford was similarly ranked to both Frazier and Mateo going into the year, and Torres is now going for TJ. He's right in the mix with all of them.
See above, my opinion obv. but whatever lets take a look at below:

Posted Feb 13 2017

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/ar...rticleid=31160

Posted July 6 2017

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/ar...rticleid=32224


True similarly ranked in Feb. but Rutherford fell out of the top 50 as recently as two weeks ago so something happened. Again not that I didn't like Rutherford I just think Frazier is a better prospect. Also considering that they gave up Miller to get Frazier the Yanks are way more invested to see him succeed.


Quote:
Originally Posted by AGame18
No, it wasn't. The move was to stay put and hope to run good, or trade for a SP if you can get one. Giving up Rutherford for Gray MIGHT make sense. Giving up Mateo or whoever now for him would be very bad imo. Gray still isn't enough for us to make me confident we're one of the best teams (or even the best in our own division) and we'd be seriously gutting our prospects.
Don't confuse your opinion with fact, if you think standing pat was the way to go I guess we'll find out soon enough. I agree to the extent that I don't want to gut the farm especially since they did so well to build it up last year, but you gotta give to get.

As far as Sonny Gray come to think of it I'm not sure if he's Mateo worthy persay but if Yonder was in the mix too then Mateo, Rutherford, + "x" prospect(s) could have been the way to go but my guess is the Yanks tried to make this happen at first but they wanted too much.


Quote:
Originally Posted by AGame18
I like Kahnle a lot, but you're crazy if you think he was the reason the Yanks made the deal. If they liked him so much they could have not let him go in the Rule 5 draft a few years ago. He's looked great this year but it's 30 innings. He has no pedigree--who knows how great he'll be. The Yanks made this deal for Frazier. The bullpen arms are just extra insurance.
Is it possible that the conversation started with T. Frazier, ok, but it obv didn't end with him. Kahnle is controlled through 2020 and has the highest ceiling of the 3 in terms of performance and trade value if he balls out. So I'm sure once it was a possibility that Kahnle could be had Frazier became the afterthought rather than the primary goal.


Quote:
Originally Posted by AGame18
Have no idea what the first 2 sentences mean but as to the last one--no, I don't play results. We could win the World Series because Todd Frazier has a Daniel Murphyesque postseason and it wouldn't change my opinion that this was a bad deal. I don't think it's the WOAT deal, I just would have rather not done it than done it, that's all.
If only Frazier stepped in it like that...plz one-time...but this isn't poker where your judged on decision making based on incomplete information. Trading players you know who the players are in the moment, so your playing the hands face up at all times. The point I'm making is you can't really judge for 100% certainty if it wound up being a good or bad deal for at least a couple of seasons because the results still have to play out based on the motivations of the teams involved.

In this case the White Sox are playing the long game and the Yanks are kinda caught in the middle where they want to be players but don't want to overplay their hand. From my end I judge it from that perspective rather than only the players involved. Even if I don't agree with the plan I still think in order to judge the trade accurately the results matter based on players + team goals.


Quote:
Originally Posted by AGame18
If Judge really is the GOAT, seems to me more reason why Yanks wouldn't even want Harper. Someone would have to switch positions and I'm not sure either would really want to (and neither could play CF consistently so it would have to be LF).
Or DH...the problem though is as constructed currently they are so RHB heavy they need LHB power to balance out the team. Didi and Gardy are ok but when you play 81 games at Yankee Stadium and have no legit power threat from the left side it kinda leaves you exposed, that's part in parcel of why Harper is the dream, but aside that they need a legit LH HR threat.
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 01:15 AM
Here we go with Chapman. Just take him out of the game, pull him off the mound by his ear, and throw him in the bathroom.
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 01:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyB66
Here we go with Chapman. Just take him out of the game, pull him off the mound by his ear, and throw him in the bathroom.
That two run error in the top of the inning looming LARGE. I hope Robbie isn't still a Yankee fan.
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 01:16 AM
Do Yankees fans, or Cashman, care that Sad Panda would be starting game 2 of playoff series?
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 03:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruizn63
Brewers would be dumb if they actually try making s run for the division this season. Cubbies aren't going to be losing many games this second half of the season.
Pirates are going to win the division ez game.
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 04:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PunkRockHec
My point isn't player specific. One of your arguments of keeping a blue-chipish type player was the organizational depth you have in case **** happens to a player.

To make this simple you need to only answer one question; what should the goal be for the rest of the season.

The plan coming out of Spring Training was no expectations whatsoever, let the kids develop and see what they got which as a fan I'm 100% behind because there was no pressure, and no need to win this year. Now were 11 days away from the deadline, you look and see your in a playoff spot at present, so you ask the question again and they answered YES were going for it.

I posted this in the STT thread a couple of weeks ago if they are going to go for it don't trade anything high valued, which imo I deemed as Torres, and Frazier as untouchable. Regardless since they are going for it, should you really worry about the WHAT IF an injury happens, no you assess your needs, look at your assets, and make a deal. Am I really concerned if Ellsbury slips and breaks his vagina...not on 7/20...and if I'm Cashman that can't be a consideration at the deadline to improve the team.
The "what if" isn't about Ellsbury getting hurt tomorrow. It's about Ellsbury getting hurt in 2020 when Rutherford could be ready for the show.



Quote:
Originally Posted by PunkRockHec

See above, my opinion obv. but whatever lets take a look at below:

Posted Feb 13 2017

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/ar...rticleid=31160

Posted July 6 2017

http://www.baseballprospectus.com/ar...rticleid=32224


True similarly ranked in Feb. but Rutherford fell out of the top 50 as recently as two weeks ago so something happened. Again not that I didn't like Rutherford I just think Frazier is a better prospect. Also considering that they gave up Miller to get Frazier the Yanks are way more invested to see him succeed.
A few months doth a pedigree not much change. Besides, even if Frazier is better, I don't see why Mateo is. I can show you many top prospect lists that list him behind Rutherford at the start of the year.


Quote:
Originally Posted by PunkRockHec
Don't confuse your opinion with fact, if you think standing pat was the way to go I guess we'll find out soon enough. I agree to the extent that I don't want to gut the farm especially since they did so well to build it up last year, but you gotta give to get.
lol. Obviously everything I say about what the Yankees should do is opinion; I'm not confused about that. But again, if I am right, I'm right REGARDLESS of what happens in the future, and the same thing is true if I'm wrong. This is a poker forum. In poker, you hear all the time that you shouldn't be "results oriented." Sports are no different. Sometimes bad moves work out, sometimes good moves do not. I think this was a bad move (but again, not brutally bad or anything, just one I wouldn't have made). And as mentioned, if Todd Frazier leads us to a WS and you come to me and say "I told you so," I will not admit that I was wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PunkRockHec

As far as Sonny Gray come to think of it I'm not sure if he's Mateo worthy persay but if Yonder was in the mix too then Mateo, Rutherford, + "x" prospect(s) could have been the way to go but my guess is the Yanks tried to make this happen at first but they wanted too much.
No idea about this one way or the other so won't speculate. I think Gray is solid. Was terrible last year but good every other year and pitching well this year since coming back from DL. Alonso would actually be a really good fit. I'd try to get him if he's not too expensive--he'd much cheaper than Gray because he's an impending FA and Gray is controlled until 2020.



Quote:
Originally Posted by PunkRockHec
Is it possible that the conversation started with T. Frazier, ok, but it obv didn't end with him. Kahnle is controlled through 2020 and has the highest ceiling of the 3 in terms of performance and trade value if he balls out. So I'm sure once it was a possibility that Kahnle could be had Frazier became the afterthought rather than the primary goal.
Disagree. Doesn't really make sense. Do you think we would have had to give up anyone even close to Rutherford to get just Kahnle? (Hint: don't say yes)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PunkRockHec
If only Frazier stepped in it like that...plz one-time...but this isn't poker where your judged on decision making based on incomplete information. Trading players you know who the players are in the moment, so your playing the hands face up at all times. The point I'm making is you can't really judge for 100% certainty if it wound up being a good or bad deal for at least a couple of seasons because the results still have to play out based on the motivations of the teams involved.

In this case the White Sox are playing the long game and the Yanks are kinda caught in the middle where they want to be players but don't want to overplay their hand. From my end I judge it from that perspective rather than only the players involved. Even if I don't agree with the plan I still think in order to judge the trade accurately the results matter based on players + team goals.
I don't agree. See above. You have incomplete information in both baseball and poker, don't really see the difference. Obviously there are some situations where results matter, but usually they will not, at least not to me. If we traded Aaron Judge and Gary Sanchez for Darwin Barney, that would be objectively bad, even if Judge and Sanchez both end up being scrubs and Barney suddenly becomes great. That's obvious hyperbole, but it illustrates the point.


Quote:
Originally Posted by PunkRockHec
Or DH...the problem though is as constructed currently they are so RHB heavy they need LHB power to balance out the team. Didi and Gardy are ok but when you play 81 games at Yankee Stadium and have no legit power threat from the left side it kinda leaves you exposed, that's part in parcel of why Harper is the dream, but aside that they need a legit LH HR threat.
Signing Harper to play DH would be blasphemy, and moving a 27 yr old Judge there would be equally so. I can see an argument for needing lefties to balance, but I don't see why LH power is so necessary--if you have enough power from your righties then you're fine. The reason to have lefties is to make it harder for opposing pitchers, especially bullpens. That would be true as long as they're good hitters, even if not big power guys. In any event, I don't think anyone doubts how good Harper is and how he could be even better with the short porch in the Bronx. It just can't be considered more than a pipedream right now, considering a) he hasn't once said he wants to play for the Yankees, b) Cashman hasn't once said he is interested (he can't while he's on another team), c) a recent article came out saying he prefers the Cubs to the Yankees, d) another recent article came out saying he doesn't like NY (though he was mostly talking with reference to the Mets), e) if Judge is this legit, he makes Harper much less enticing, and f) he has many times said how he loves Washington and while I think it's a foregone conclusion that he'll reach free agency, it makes perfect sense for them to try to keep their homegrown superstar and the Lerners have as much money as anyone and can certainly afford to pay him 400m if they want to.
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 04:18 AM
Cubs will be scrubs again by end of the weekend.
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 08:19 AM
Guys, take your walls of text to the Yankees thread
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 08:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bighurt52235
Awesome. You do live in the US now right?
Yep, New York though
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 08:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heroball
RBI are a poor predictive tool, relative to WAR, given context influence.

But higher productivity is definitely a fine way to judge value in the yearly or HOF contexts.
That was sort of the point, though I don't consider RBI as representative of productivity particularly.
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 09:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoe
Cubs will be scrubs again by end of the weekend.
I'll take Cubs vs Cardinals for the series at evens up to $100 if you want.
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 09:57 AM
That's an odd offer to make to a Brewers fan.
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 09:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by minnesotasam
That's an odd offer to make to a Brewers fan.
Not really considering what his post was claiming. Don't have to support a team to bet on them.
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 10:00 AM
Shoe was a devout Cardinals hater when we were winning the division every year. I suspect that hasn't changed the year that we're trash.
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 10:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGramuel
I'll take Cubs vs Cardinals for the series at evens up to $100 if you want.
Why would I do that when I can get +185 at bovada right now?

Even if you make a fair offer I'll pass though.

Last edited by Shoe; 07-21-2017 at 10:55 AM.
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 10:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by minnesotasam
Shoe was a devout Cardinals hater when we were winning the division every year. I suspect that hasn't changed the year that we're trash.
lol fair enough.
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 10:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoe
Why would I do that when I can get +185 at bovada right now?

Even if you make a fair offer I'll pass though.
Figured you might be txdome in disguise or something
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 11:21 AM
Does the wild card team get homefield in the CS if they have the better record?
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote
07-21-2017 , 12:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bware
Guys, take your walls of text to the Yankees thread
no
MLB Season Thread 2017 Quote

      
m