Quote:
Originally Posted by AGame18
This is Ellsbury bro. You make it sound like he's never been hurt before lol. Planning for him to be hurt going forward seems pretty reasonable to me.
Hunter Greene is probably 3-4 years away. Does that make him expendable too?
My point isn't player specific. One of your arguments of keeping a blue-chipish type player was the organizational depth you have in case **** happens to a player.
To make this simple you need to only answer one question; what should the goal be for the rest of the season.
The plan coming out of Spring Training was no expectations whatsoever, let the kids develop and see what they got which as a fan I'm 100% behind because there was no pressure, and no need to win this year. Now were 11 days away from the deadline, you look and see your in a playoff spot at present, so you ask the question again and they answered YES were going for it.
I posted this in the STT thread a couple of weeks ago if they are going to go for it don't trade anything high valued, which imo I deemed as Torres, and Frazier as untouchable. Regardless since they are going for it, should you really worry about the WHAT IF an injury happens, no you assess your needs, look at your assets, and make a deal. Am I really concerned if Ellsbury slips and breaks his vagina...not on 7/20...and if I'm Cashman that can't be a consideration at the deadline to improve the team.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGame18
Not sure why you're making Torres/Frazier/Mateo the holy grail. Rutherford was similarly ranked to both Frazier and Mateo going into the year, and Torres is now going for TJ. He's right in the mix with all of them.
See above, my opinion obv. but whatever lets take a look at below:
Posted Feb 13 2017
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/ar...rticleid=31160
Posted July 6 2017
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/ar...rticleid=32224
True similarly ranked in Feb. but Rutherford fell out of the top 50 as recently as two weeks ago so something happened. Again not that I didn't like Rutherford I just think Frazier is a better prospect. Also considering that they gave up Miller to get Frazier the Yanks are way more invested to see him succeed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGame18
No, it wasn't. The move was to stay put and hope to run good, or trade for a SP if you can get one. Giving up Rutherford for Gray MIGHT make sense. Giving up Mateo or whoever now for him would be very bad imo. Gray still isn't enough for us to make me confident we're one of the best teams (or even the best in our own division) and we'd be seriously gutting our prospects.
Don't confuse your opinion with fact, if you think standing pat was the way to go I guess we'll find out soon enough. I agree to the extent that I don't want to gut the farm especially since they did so well to build it up last year, but you gotta give to get.
As far as Sonny Gray come to think of it I'm not sure if he's Mateo worthy persay but if Yonder was in the mix too then Mateo, Rutherford, + "x" prospect(s) could have been the way to go but my guess is the Yanks tried to make this happen at first but they wanted too much.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGame18
I like Kahnle a lot, but you're crazy if you think he was the reason the Yanks made the deal. If they liked him so much they could have not let him go in the Rule 5 draft a few years ago. He's looked great this year but it's 30 innings. He has no pedigree--who knows how great he'll be. The Yanks made this deal for Frazier. The bullpen arms are just extra insurance.
Is it possible that the conversation started with T. Frazier, ok, but it obv didn't end with him. Kahnle is controlled through 2020 and has the highest ceiling of the 3 in terms of performance and trade value if he balls out. So I'm sure once it was a possibility that Kahnle could be had Frazier became the afterthought rather than the primary goal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGame18
Have no idea what the first 2 sentences mean but as to the last one--no, I don't play results. We could win the World Series because Todd Frazier has a Daniel Murphyesque postseason and it wouldn't change my opinion that this was a bad deal. I don't think it's the WOAT deal, I just would have rather not done it than done it, that's all.
If only Frazier stepped in it like that...plz one-time...but this isn't poker where your judged on decision making based on incomplete information. Trading players you know who the players are in the moment, so your playing the hands face up at all times. The point I'm making is you can't really judge for 100% certainty if it wound up being a good or bad deal for at least a couple of seasons because the results still have to play out based on the motivations of the teams involved.
In this case the White Sox are playing the long game and the Yanks are kinda caught in the middle where they want to be players but don't want to overplay their hand. From my end I judge it from that perspective rather than only the players involved. Even if I don't agree with the plan I still think in order to judge the trade accurately the results matter based on players + team goals.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGame18
If Judge really is the GOAT, seems to me more reason why Yanks wouldn't even want Harper. Someone would have to switch positions and I'm not sure either would really want to (and neither could play CF consistently so it would have to be LF).
Or DH...the problem though is as constructed currently they are so RHB heavy they need LHB power to balance out the team. Didi and Gardy are ok but when you play 81 games at Yankee Stadium and have no legit power threat from the left side it kinda leaves you exposed, that's part in parcel of why Harper is the dream, but aside that they need a legit LH HR threat.