Quote:
Originally Posted by Montrealcorp
Yup and before adding great player like magic, they could not win.
Same thing with Celtic and bird and lebron with the heat Miami.
Again long term chemistry blabla did nothing for them because as soon they add talent they won while it did not help Malone/Stockton either even tho they had great chemistry and long players year together.
It just that bs I hear about the reason Jordan/pippen success is they had the opportunity to play together for a long time is so garbage .....
The only reason pippen end up being great is because he had Jordan to practice with and play with .
Pippen could of been replace by any good new player and Jordan could of still won .
Give Jordan , instead of pippen , any good players like Barkley, ewing , and you think it will take Jordan couple of years to adapt and win ?
Comon....
Ps: just give rookie shaq instead of pippen and you think Jordan can't win ...that would be lol.
As soon you team up a rookie true HOF with Jordan, you just laugh about how even greater the bull would of been .
Instead it took of a couple years with pippen to become good enough for Jordan to win.
Add a rookie shaq and Jordan wins right away....
Again those playing years of experience blabla ...pfft
It's all that easy right?
Basically Jordan didn't win till Pippen and Grant were good enough. When he had a good enough team, they won titles. I didn't say all it takes is time for a good team to win. I said first you need talent, a lot of it. You also need luck, teamwork, chemistry, etc. So basically, I could wake up in 1987, Pippen first year and we replace Pippen with any other HOF rookie and MJ is magically a world beater in 1987--takes out Detroit/Boston/Lakers all in 1 year?
Yes if you add Shaq, arguably a top 5 player all time to team with the GOAT, they definitely could win it all. I'm sure if Lebron had Shaq early in his career, they'd pump out titles to. Do you think it would be the same let's say if you gave MJ, Kyrie Irving and Kevin Love or Wade and Bosh, it would be super simple for them to be utterly dominant; Wade and MJ might get in each others way. MJ wouldn't have a super elite, dominant wing to guard the top SG/SF/PF on the other team like Pippen does.
My point with that comment is MJ/Pippen wasn't successful year 1, they won 10 more games then they'd won the previous year and lost in the 2nd round to the Pistons. Year 1 of Lebron they were pretty good but lost in the finals to a team they shouldn't have lost to and likely wouldn't have lost to if they were as good as they were the next 2 seasons.
Not many teams are really thrown together over night that were either mediocre or marginally with high team turnover. The Lakers just essentially added Magic to a 47 win team. The Warriors just added KD to a 73 win team. Duncan was added to a good team that just tried to lose the previous season by sitting DRob when he was healthy. The Lakers/Kobe took a few years to figure things out as well. Kobe wasn't good enough year 1 to be competitive.
Lebron/Love joined a 33 win team that basically kept 4 players; TT, Delladova and Kyrie (Deng, Bynum, Jarret Jack left and other than Deng, not very good anymore). Lebron basically joined Bosh with Wade on a ~47 win team but lost Jermaine, Beasley, Wright who weren't that great but again the team had a ton of turnover from year to year. Again that's a ton of Lebron's fault of joining a team that was doing this.