Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
I hope everyone itt who is saying, "Saints are not the only team that were doing something like this," felt the same way about the Pats situation. There is plenty of evidence that other teams were doing what the Pats did (especially in prior years, not sure about 2007), but the Pats were made an example of, just like the Saints are going to be in this case.
What do you expect? Lots of people are shoplifters too but the ones who get caught red-handed are the ones punished. Pats got caught. Saints got caught and in a big way by the looks of it. We're now in the 6th year of the Roger Goodell era so the league's reaction to this last bit shouldn't be a surprise to anybody now. The Saints coaching staff knew the risk.
Like most everyone else here I'm sure bounties have been and are plenty common. Same with Spygate type situations. Or tampering. But when these things get to the league office what else are they supposed to do about it? If you're not going to enforce your own rules then there's no point of making them in the first place. They want to discourage these types of things so they have to react in a way that will be effective in doing that.
Sorry New Orleans, but you got caught first, suck it up. Maybe there will be more teams to follow. It's 2012 and these days you've got not just the NFL but players and their union always calling for the league to do more to emphasize player safety. You just can't have it both ways.