Quote:
Originally Posted by rtoon
Well, he was actually correct about the Super Bowl play that ended his broadcasting career. The replay system is a joke. That was a botched call in the Super Bowl. There were a number of bad decisions made in replay last year. Carey made some mistakes and looked worse than he actually was, but it is funny that what knocked him out was actually correct analysis.
What is crazy is that replay is a total mind game now, where you are trying to predict what type of mistakes the booth might make on replay, instead of what really happened. And that is why most all of these so-called experts like Pereira and Carey often look like fools. The call on the field should always stand unless there is no room for reasonable disagreement, but what it has turned into is a total resetting of the play, and the call turns into a majority opinion (kind of like the difference between being convicted in a criminal case and a civil case). If people who have watched the games for decades can reasonably disagree on a certain play, and those in the booth can reasonably disagree, then the call on the field should stand. Replay is a disaster.
Why should the call on the field have privilege once it goes to a replay review? When things are uncertain, why don't they go based on the preponderance of evidence, which is going to be based on the video evidence? The entire reason it's kicked up to the booth is in case the ref messed up.
As far as I'm concerned, the replay officials should not even be told what the call on the field is, they should give it their best guess. Just because there can be disagreement doesn't mean one side is much more likely to be right than the other.