Quote:
Originally Posted by 72off
it's estimated that there are over 2 million people living in the metro Vegas area, so it won't be completely dependent on tourists. but i think there will be a lot of comped tourists at games. their tourism actually industry gives them a built in advantage over some other places as i see it.
hockey has worked in California, so i don't see why it can't in Las Vegas.
i also don't the failures in Glendale and Sunrise as having much to do with it.
I have no doubt in my mind that Vegas would be able to easily overcome some hurdles that are involved with having a pro franchise in the city.
-Arena would likely be no problem as MGM is building a rink on the strip (so I've heard)
-Corporate sponsorship would be handled easily through the casinos.
-Marketability would be easy as Las Vegas does a very good job of this already and yes, I agree, that they would be able to comp the high roller casino players, include them in packages for tourists, etc.
The comparison that you gave with California though doesn't hold a lot of weight though.
First off, market size is very important. Vegas would be one of the smallest markets in the US outside of Buffalo. California works in big reason due to market size. To give you a comparison, California and Canada basically have the same population (California has 3 teams, Canada has 7).
Wayne Gretzky probably saved hockey in California as there is still a huge local fan base that was generated when he was traded there in the early 90s. Unless Vegas has a diehard hockey fanbase I just don't see it working.
It could work if they have a fanbase and this is why I think that the season ticket drive will be really interesting to see how it goes. If they are able to sell 10,000+ season tickets than I will retract my statement since that is the biggest hurdle in my mind.