Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case

03-19-2016 , 06:46 AM
115 million. Lol.
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-19-2016 , 07:00 AM
Gawker intentionally did what it did tho. It'd be more similar to the Andrews case if somebody hacked their servers and uploaded that video on there, thus exposing it to the world.

Last edited by JayTeeMe; 03-19-2016 at 07:18 AM.
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-19-2016 , 07:13 AM
Hogan ruling is absolutely ridiculous.

He should've gotten at least $250 million to completely guarantee that Gawker dissolves as a business. **** Gawker.
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-19-2016 , 07:15 AM
Punitive damages still coming, so there's hope
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-19-2016 , 07:22 AM
Has the EA hotel hired astroturfers? Why the hell are people so mad?
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-19-2016 , 07:35 AM
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-19-2016 , 08:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooders0n
Has the EA hotel hired astroturfers? Why the hell are people so mad?
Because she's a woman.
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-19-2016 , 09:55 AM
115 for Hulkster? EA up against the glass ceiling
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-19-2016 , 10:51 AM
55 million looking like a steal.
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-19-2016 , 03:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by offTopic
115 for Hulkster? EA up against the glass ceiling
Apparently only nine seconds of sex in Hulk tape too.
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-19-2016 , 04:02 PM
You sure that's not the Rick Pitino tape?
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-19-2016 , 10:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noze
You sure that's not the Rick Pitino tape?
From the CNN article

Quote:
Sullivan downplayed the raunchiness of the nearly two-minute video package that was posted on Gawker, which only included nine seconds of sex.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/03/18/medi...ons/index.html
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-21-2016 , 05:32 PM
The Hogan suit amount is also completely ridiculous.

Gawker did indeed probably deserve to lose the suit and pay some damages, but the amount is once again a jury just seeking to really stick it to an unlikeable defendant.

I don't see how any reasonable person would think Hogan suffered 115 million worth of damages, either emotional or to his career.
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-21-2016 , 06:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cotton Hill
The Hogan suit amount is also completely ridiculous.

Gawker did indeed probably deserve to lose the suit and pay some damages, but the amount is once again a jury just seeking to really stick it to an unlikeable defendant.

I don't see how any reasonable person would think Hogan suffered 115 million worth of damages, either emotional or to his career.
Sure but unlike the hotel Gawker actually spread the video.
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-21-2016 , 06:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cotton Hill
The Hogan suit amount is also completely ridiculous.

Gawker did indeed probably deserve to lose the suit and pay some damages, but the amount is once again a jury just seeking to really stick it to an unlikeable defendant.

I don't see how any reasonable person would think Hogan suffered 115 million worth of damages, either emotional or to his career.
It's not just about compensating Hogan. It's about sending a message. The only thing that would be better would be if their punitive damages don't go to the plaintiff but instead to the state or charity.
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-21-2016 , 06:40 PM
lol you are an idiot. dude lost quite a lot of legacy from this tape. i am glad they are about to get hit with more though from punitive damage. how ***** dumb do you have to be to not remove it from your multi million dollar site when the judge sends you an order? you deserve to lose everything.
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-22-2016 , 12:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by borg23
Sure but unlike the hotel Gawker actually spread the video.
Oh I agree, unlike the hotel, when didn't actively participate in any way, Gawker intentionally violated privacy, very egregiously when you factor in them defying court orders to continue to do so, thus forcing them to pay SOME damages seems legit. I just find the amount pretty absurd.
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-22-2016 , 12:52 AM
An extra $25m in punitive as well!
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-22-2016 , 01:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omniheart
lol you are an idiot. dude lost quite a lot of legacy from this tape.
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-22-2016 , 01:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omniheart
lol you are an idiot. dude lost quite a lot of legacy from this tape. i am glad they are about to get hit with more though from punitive damage. how ***** dumb do you have to be to not remove it from your multi million dollar site when the judge sends you an order? you deserve to lose everything.
Pretty sure dude got erased from WWE history when that tape of him dropping all those N-bombs came out.
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote
03-22-2016 , 02:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperUberBob
Apparently only nine seconds of sex in Hulk tape too.
That's about 4 more seconds than I last
Erin Andrews Awarded M in Stalker Case Quote

      
m