Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Paul
You didn't ask for a comparison with other clubs, you asked us to explain how their transfer policy has been very successful, which it has been because it helped them achieve what they set out to do.
The success of other clubs with different strategies is irrelevant to the question you asked.
I agree comparison with other clubs strategies is somewhat irrelevant, however it does provide a point of contrast.
Anyway, the bottom line is that if Stoke were happy with the transfer strategy employed by Pulis, then they wouldn't have employed a technical director in December 2012 and sacked Pulis the following summer. The following 2 seasons saw their gross spend at £2m for 13/14, and £4.3m for 14/15, while they finished higher in the league (9th both seasons) than under Pulis whose best finish was 11th.