Current day NFL Dynasty Draft THREAD

[prohornblower]

I will say that if the 3 people I expect to get taken before me get taken, that my #4 is clear and I will pick him (or her).

[BillNye]

Originally Posted by prohornblower

Saying the top ___ is clear is already kind of a faux pas but it is certainly generally accepted. Saying you think the top 5 are clear and are all QBs is too much information.

agreed.

[TalkingDonkey]

Originally Posted by BillNye

once again i disagree with the people saying the next few are easy.

I doubt half of us could agree on a top 5, order being irrelevant.

Yeah this.

I have a decent idea of who I'm expecting to go 2-5 but there are a handful of guys outside of that range who wouldn't surprise me much if they got picked.

[goodlookskid]

I disagree with a certain consensus being obvious, but I do agree that the undrafted consensus was probably the right choice, although it is debatable. It will be extremely interesting to see whether undrafted, undrafted or undrafted goes first as I suspect they are all close, although I think it is clear there are arguments for all of them. After that I suspect that undrafted would be next of the board but It would not surprise me to see a few undrafted consensus clear picks

[prohornblower]

I run sick hot in drafting early in drafts. Seems like in over 80% of the drafts I've been in I've selected like top 1/4.

It's kinda cool but drafting between like 5-10 out of 25 in an ABBA draft kinda blows. In ABBA you really really want to get a top 3 pick.

[dcm91]

i know who i would take at 2 3 and 4 but i am positive it is not the consensus.

[rmthawk64]

Hmm. I'm not sure how much weight people are putting into age in this because I can't really put together a definitive top 4-5

[prohornblower]

I'm heading to bed. I guess there is a delay overnight for skipping people. I pick 4th, don't skip me tomorrow as I will hop on as soon as I wake up and make a pick.

[Debo9]

Smiglet will go on the clock at 9AM. I did not want to punish people for not being here when I said in the sign up thread that we would start today. I've sent him a PM so he knows he is up

[loK2thabrain]

The impatience in these things is always hilarious to me.

[iggymcfly]

I'm not in the draft, but I'm pretty interested to see who goes next. I agree that there are only two reasonable choices that can go at 2 or 3, but I think you could make really good arguments for both, but if they both get taken in the next 2 selections, I'd be very surprised.

[WaterWalker]

Originally Posted by Victor

well thanks for proving me rite



i mean, it was rilly hard to realize the draft wud be starting soon at the last time u poasted in the sign up thread. and even if u picked up on the clues, who wuda thought u wuda got hte frist pick? and even if u knew it was a remote possibility, wat kinda nerd sits around to participate in an internet exercise.

absolved.

I want to post the notsureifserious.jpg, but I'm pretty sure you are serious. I'd rather not derail this thread by going into specifics...so I'll just say you're so obviously wrong, and move on.

As for the Rodgers pick; he was the first player that came to mind for me but wasn't sure he was the consensus until I took a closer look at his numbers compared to others. Obviously age is a factor when picking in a dynasty format, but how big of a factor is the question...and would he still be the consensus if he was 30 years old instead of 28?

Btw, I sent smiglet a PM shortly after I posted my pick.

[dcm91]

30 makes it a little closer but i'd still personally take him #1. i mean how much you factor age into the equation is all personal preference and how you wanna build yr team.

[iggymcfly]

Actually, as I think about it more, #2's really clear, probably an easier pick than picking 3rd. Still don't think he's going next though.

[dkgojackets]

off to a roaring start