Quote:
Originally Posted by thechef
On the other hand, you may have thought after bowling Sri Lanka out for 117 first innings, they might just have had enough to scrape the win. Fair enough for taking it on the chin though.
Absolutely I can say that I was chuffed when I read the scoreboard that Sri Lanka had been bowled out for 117 and thinking that how could Australia lose from here but the result shows just how much of a "test" test match cricket is that you have to be on top of your game the entire 5 days as one poor innings and you can let the other team in to win. Just look at that test match in 2001 in Kolkata when Australia asked India to follow on with a lead of 300 having bowled them out for 171 for them to comeback and win by 171 runs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thechef
To be honest, I'm a bit worried about how England will get on in India this winter. I think England are better equipped than Australia are from a batting perspective but India is the toughest test possible in those conditions. From a bowling perspective, we're less well prepared. We don't have a Nathan Lyon equivalent (a spinner who plays virtually every match and performs consistently well). Moeen will play partly because of his batting and partly because if he doesn't, we'll have to call up a relative rookie alongside Rashid. I think when all is said and done, it'll end up that the pace attack does the bulk of the work as usual. How far that gets us in the subcontinent I'm not sure.
I agree that England are better served than Australia when travelling to India and facing their conditions with the general slower and lower pitches in England compared to Australia. To be honest though, I can't split the batting between England and Australia. It will be a great summer next year here.