Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrizza
For some reason I'm totally in the dark about Gimelstob, why is he the worst?
Quote:
Gimelstob’s steady stream of gobbledygook about players, technique, and strategy execution can be so totally incomprehensible his contemporaries sit by in silence.
Let’s take his initial Davis Cup belief that, at first, the Swiss didn’t have enough fire power to dislodge the French. Pair that with the notion that, “They [French] just don’t have a big enough weapon to disrupt the Swiss team.” His assessment crossed the net a couple more times, leaving fans fatigued, unsure who did or did not have the fire power while many rolled their eyes — what the heck, does he know he’s repeating himself?
His preposterous presentation of player techniques must to go the way of his sexist comments from 2008 about Anna Kournikova.
http://thetennisisland.com/2014/12/0...-commentators/
That article doesn't even go far enough imo. Just listen to Gimelstob commentate a match, he says the dumbest **** just because he thinks he's being original and provocative. It's like the way his brain works is "ok, I need to make some kind of profound declaration every 5 minutes, regardless if there's any truth to what I say, or is the opposite of what I just said 5 minutes ago."
He's also incredibly jingoist and only wants to talk about Americans. He can't get through a match between two serbians without mentioning what a great forehand Sam Querrey has. It's like the british eurosport commies who talk about Robson and Watson for 20 solid minutes in the middle of a radwanska-kvitova match.