Trivial O8 hand checkup: Nut high v most passive dude ever ($15/$30 LO8) - Page 2 - Omaha 8 Poker Forum

Agreed but i think double suited is a stretch. The OP seemed to disparage the villain in general which leads me to believe it was A234.

And i say raise flop against these ranged hands for value. Most seem to say that value is too thin.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's a gutter or a small wrap, right? 4 outs twice to a straight that can still lose when paired at best. 9 outs to a wheel at worse. Only two backdoor flushes are possible as well since Hearts are covered.

A 3! on flop makes sense. If Villain caps, who cares as that doesn't really change our read on his hand. In fact, it likely narrows it to a 9 out scenario.

Even if he has 2345, its the same story really.

Quote

06-15-2017 , 02:39 PM

#27

OtherMoachist

enthusiast

Join Date: May 2017 Posts: 54

Someone said to look to check raise the turn if a wheel card doesn't come. But a loose passive player will never bet the turn if a wheel card doesn't come.

Quote

06-15-2017 , 06:51 PM

#28

jdr0317

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 8,231

I'll post what he had and the rest of the hand for you guys:

Spoiler:

Quote

06-15-2017 , 06:53 PM

#29

chillrob

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 20,855

Had you been raising a lot and making him frustrated?

Quote

06-15-2017 , 06:56 PM

#30

jdr0317

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 8,231

Quote:

Originally Posted by chillrob

Had you been raising a lot and making him frustrated?

Yes on the raising, unsure on the frustrated. Essentially the table is him, SB (nit), BB (fellow loose passive with more enigmatic postflop), myself, and CO (a bit of a LAG). I'm by far the most aggressive one entering the pot here.

Even if he was frustrated at me, spazzy 3 bets weren't normally in his Arsenal.