Quote:
Originally Posted by belg_owner
Made a video today, heads up FLO 27.5 top 3 got payed out since there was a small overlay.
It only took 15 minutes... since i ran pretty good. But would like it if some of u guys watched it. (to maybe point out some leaks)
And if u guys like it (or hate it) just say so no hard feelings
27.5 flo with some 82ploko on the side.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1H3...ature=youtu.be
Asking for "better players" I am probably posting in the wrong place but:
I think you had a good read on the HU game and played just fine with the info you had. A couple of times set vs set, one for, one against, running was decent, villain wasn't putting you under any pressure
On the other table you made a few plays I maybe wouldn't have. The first (A3)TK limp/call to the player you mark as TAG, that looks like leak to me. I think you know there are very few hands TAG will raise there and be giving us good odds at high OR low pot. So limp/fold if we limp pre
Again limp pre after no action (A 2)3 9. I think I prefer to KO the trash hands with standard raise pre. If this TAG you have marked is tricky I don't think it's ever smart to give a free flop unless you think he will try to steal any pot that you don't first try to steal. It's better if TAG put chips in pre so we can have partial read on the hand. If TAG is tricky here and the flop is paired high or some other random that doesn't fit standard ranges, TAG will bet out quite often with any 4 cards.
Again limp pre (A 2)(4 K). I don't mind limping here at all but why are we doing it? You say something like, "I don't want to jump but if someone else wants to jump I will give them the rope and let them hang". Are we limping here to want to be raised or to control the pot? If we get raised by a bigger stack do we flat call or 3-bet like against the shorter stack? Imagine 3 limpers (villain, SB, BB) and give me the scenario we win the pot. You were talking about limp (A 3)T K to hit nut flush vs 2nd flush. OK but it's more likely to get 3/4 or scoop with your A24K vs standard hands. Again I prefer to raise because A, K, flushing and A2 boards are easiest fits for random hands to get away from - but when called pre we often dominate in one or both directions. If BB plus one other player limps we always have < 50% equity.
With AAJQ you can play it any way you like. The limp gives disguise and the raise maybe gets a walk so 6 of one. On the flop I'm not certain that is a good fold. We still have outs (we have A hearts too) and I'm not convinced we are behind by a margin greater than our pot odds. Quite often the big stack has draw combos/2 pair and the turn card should be OK for us to read or even rep something ourselves depending on how villain continues. My read is you don't even want to try that against a bigger stack which is fine, but if me I am OK with putting in 12 chips here to win 30 + chips
I don't mind limp pre strategy and it's great for mix up but what do you think your opponents think of this? If you limp that range what hands are you raising, top 2% only, none? You gain scare equity for your raises by playing like that. If I was at the table I would give you 1 or 2 free raises but when you limp I would figure pretty fast that you don't want any resistance, looks a little like playing scared and fit/fold the board.
Overall I think you played fine or good if you know you should be making the adjustments and gear changes you were saying your HU villain wasn't making, or was too slow to make. You also rate your HU villain the same as krokotopus or whatever his name is. You may not like kroko but he's better than your HU villain based on this evidence.