Originally Posted by Acetylcholine
tipp86 are you saying this winrate is something you could theoretically achieve, or have you already done it over a significant sample?
If it is the latter, care to share any PokerTracker/HEM stats/graphs to back it up?
Because I would have thought that despite what your calculations seem to show, a $50/hr winrate at 50NL over a significant sample size is a little unusual. Perhaps I'm wrong.
i thought i stated that enough times for people to understand.
But if you want my thoughts on how achievable what i wrote was i think i could give a could accurate explanation.
My win rate last year was about 2bb/100 but it took a massive down swing in Jan so im at about 1bb/100 winrate now. Ok my 2bb/100 was over a 300k sample so its not a bad sample il work with that for the moment as there is a decent few guys on ipoker who are 50nl regs wiith that winrate.
I personally 9 tabled so that worked out at about £23 an hour 9 tabling with a 2bb/100 winrate. Thats $37 an hour and trust me im not very good i wont claim to be.
I could not 16 table but there is guys who can and im pretty sure some can do it at least break even. That is £30 per hour which is nearly $50. Im sure there is some guys who are very good and can win playing tha many tables so it may be realistic but anyone who can will just move up levels and move down tables or whatever.
If you find any flaws in my theory il try answer them. Im not saying i could achieve anything but i think it can be achieved and would have good facts to prove it.