Quote:
Originally Posted by Mateo94
As a computer scientist i can attest that each programmer codes the same thing differently. So i would not put it out of the realm of speculation that the code for each companies RNGs are different but relatively the same. Also player pool is much different and how you play against them can make you a winning or losing player. Its not so much that its rigged but can seem so based on these and many other things. I will give you an example my bank roll was 30 Buy Ins for 25NL so about $750 i had on Bovada which is suppose to host the fishiest players in the world. I was turning a profit for the first day or so then out of no where suck out upon suck out especially on the river. it came to the point i didn't even want to get it in because everytime i would get it in a head the villain would get runner runner or some sort of set suck out on the river. One night after a $250 dollar down swing i said alright i am done with this **** and left. I went over to Americas card room(btw i am from USA) put $200 dollars on there. In the last five days i have brought that number up to about $450, i am set to win $150 from the beast on the 31st have about $50 in rake back coming today and will have $150-200 by the 31th, and have 50 dollars in bonus cash available with $200 more to come from my reload bonus. I am currently crushing 25NL staying plus EV and positive gains. So i analyzed what i was doing differently. Well for one thing better benefits but aside from that i am still winning compared to losing. Well obviously HUD made a different but not really i crush live when i do play so that wasn't it. The player pool is pretty nit and the ones that arent spew money into your kipper had a guy the other day opening 97% of hands and calling down to the river on most hands. Since the players are nitty i can push them around more and make spots that look like a pro should fold. Giving them bad odds to call and looking at decent hand ranges and giving them over odds to stay in. The other thing i did was i pulled a couple hands out of my range. I was playing some suited gappers from the blinds to trap example 86s or 97s. Making these changes to your game can be the critical swing you need in such a volatile game.
Sincerely,
Ex Riggie
I think it is probably the case that the same RNG's are used all across the board. There is a standard, after all, which the industry would like to claim adherence to.
However, what exactly happens between the output of the RNG and the cards displayed on particular tables could be suspect. This is to say, maybe we are looking in the wrong place for anomalies: perhaps teh RNG is fine but what happens to the data coming out of the RNG is the real question: is that data translated directly to the cards seen on teh table or is something being done to that data before it hits the table?
