Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Zuckerberg Says He's Not Running For President (he totally is tho) Zuckerberg Says He's Not Running For President (he totally is tho)

08-07-2017 , 07:12 PM
Zuckerberg is not a Great Talent whose time has come. Zuckerberg is a lottery winner surrounded by people who no longer know how to disagree with him.
08-07-2017 , 08:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by amoeba
Out of current possible 2020 candidates, Zuckerberg seems the most competent.
Not a Facebook fan, not a zuckerberg fan but he is smart abd seems sincerely open to the thoughts and ideas of others.

Maybe we do need a legitimately accomplished younger president. Only nominating those past their expiration dates. We definitely need to get younger at that position somehow instead of it being an end of life bucket list. I think I noted before but since we have a minimum age I think candidates must be no older than 60 on Election Day of their first term.

Nobody is growing so much between 60 and 70 that they become a much better president.

Zucks might not be the guy but we have to have some 30, 40,50 something to make a run.

The standard line ups for twenty twenty are barf inducing.
08-07-2017 , 08:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomdemaine
Do liberals fall for the rich = smart nonsense too?
Nah they like old is smart no sense unless they are black.
08-07-2017 , 08:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by poconoder
if by scratch you mean stealing someone else's idea and initial development work.
To steal anyone's idea on anything and turning it into a massive company with billions and billions of users yeah.

Ideas are pretty much a dime a dozen in business. You could give the same concept to 100 budding entrepreneurs and ninety nine would crash and burn.

Implemtation and execution are the difficult parts. Even if you believe the mythology the winklevoss twins were not sitting on a billion dollar idea.
08-07-2017 , 08:14 PM
So if Facebook Inc decided they wanted Zuck to win... that would be really bad for the opposition, yeah?
08-07-2017 , 08:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperUberBob
Think he'd just be a left-wing version of Trump: a billionaire businessman diving head first into the highest office in the land in a field that he has no practical experience in.

Sure he's a smart guy unlike Trump but just because he created a social network doesn't mean he will automatically be a competent POTUS. The whole "if he runs the country like his business" notion didn't work out with Trump and it won't work with Zuckerberg.
He is also a billionaire unlike trump
08-07-2017 , 08:31 PM
He could definitely buy The Trump Organization and use it as his ping pong room
08-07-2017 , 08:32 PM
Whatever happens the Dems need to stay unified under a strategy of ABT (Anyone But Trump). Zuck might have some positives like the Facebook media empire behind him but if it turns out he doesn't have the charisma (which seems likely) then the Dems need to work to get him to turn his massive resources out for someone who does. There's too much at stake in 2020 to lose to that bozo again.
08-07-2017 , 08:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman
He could definitely buy The Trump Organization and use it as his ping pong room
Buying FOX News would be the elite move. Especially if done through like 400 shell companies or something so no one knew he was the one who owned it.
08-07-2017 , 08:45 PM
how much credit does Zuck get versus Sean Parker or others for FB strategy and success?
08-07-2017 , 08:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmgGlutten!
how much credit does Zuck get versus Sean Parker or others for FB strategy and success?
None, because Al Gore invented the internet. All of the credit goes to the government just like with PayPal.
08-07-2017 , 08:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinopoker
...but if it turns out he doesn't have the charisma (which seems likely) then the Dems need to work to get him to turn his massive resources out for someone who does.
Why do people assume he's going to spend gobs of his own money self-funding his campaign or shipping money to the Dems?
08-07-2017 , 09:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Why do people assume he's going to spend gobs of his own money self-funding his campaign or shipping money to the Dems?
Because Trump is the President.
08-08-2017 , 05:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmgGlutten!
how much credit does Zuck get versus Sean Parker or others for FB strategy and success?
At this point it seems like I wouldn't make a serious post here, but this is serious.

I'm kinda warming up to The Zuck. I think if we're going this route he's ideal precisely because he never had a good original idea himself and Facebook's success has little to do with him personally. But, he was in charge, and he listened to the 100 different good ideas of the 100 different people he hired, and the 100 good ideas of people before him, and implemented them. He would snap do UHC and the like because he'd think, hey, it works for those other countries so let's just hire smart people and have them copy it. Done and done. He'd be the antitrump.

Maybe.

Last edited by 6ix; 08-08-2017 at 05:45 AM. Reason: maybe not
08-08-2017 , 06:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinopoker
Buying FOX News would be the elite move. Especially if done through like 400 shell companies or something so no one knew Ukrainian oligarchs owned it.
.
08-08-2017 , 06:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
He'd be the antitrump.

Maybe.
Maybe. He's more like a lefty Trump. The anti-Trump is Democracy.

...and truth, and freedom, and US laws+values+morals, equality, accountability, transparency, education, consistency, science, and seriously **** this scumbag cheater.
08-08-2017 , 07:49 AM
All this focus on original idea is so silly. Take the last 5 presidents and name an original idea they've come up with.

Ideas are worthless. It's all in the execution.
08-08-2017 , 07:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6ix
But, he was in charge, and he listened to the 100 different good ideas of the 100 different people he hired, and the 100 good ideas of people before him, and implemented them. He would snap do UHC and the like because he'd think, hey, it works for those other countries so let's just hire smart people and have them copy it.
lol, this is almost verbatim exactly what people said about Trump.
08-08-2017 , 08:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
lol, this is almost verbatim exactly what people said about Trump.
Well yeah, that's why I said he'd be the antitrump.
08-08-2017 , 12:52 PM
Putting aside for the moment the question of whether Zuckerberg would be a good president, is there any reason to believe that he would be an engaging candidate? I've never thought of him as a particularly charismatic or memorable public presence.
08-08-2017 , 01:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo
Putting aside for the moment the question of whether Zuckerberg would be a good president, is there any reason to believe that he would be an engaging candidate? I've never thought of him as a particularly charismatic or memorable public presence.
The plan is for him to run in the primary to make Hillary look charming and charadmastic.
08-08-2017 , 01:47 PM
Legit lol'ed.
08-08-2017 , 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by campfirewest
The plan is for him to run in the primary to make Hillary look charming and charadmastic.
08-08-2017 , 07:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachii
Agree with this 100%. I made it through about 10 seconds of that speech before turning it off, lol.
I probably made it about 30-35 seconds through the actual speech. And this is after the first 40 seconds or so of that super awkward introduction where MZ is nervously fidgeting, abruptly smiling crazily at no one in particular, and doing some sort of coke nose wipe and shimmy. The dude's odd, there will be no President Cringe.
08-09-2017 , 04:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Our House
Maybe. He's more like a lefty Trump. The anti-Trump is Democracy.

...and truth, and freedom, and US laws+values+morals, equality, accountability, transparency, education, consistency, science, and seriously **** this scumbag cheater.
True, but I was using ANTItrump in the sense that all the bull**** people hypothesized about trump's governing style, that trump himself paid lip service to, that would require an extreme setting aside of any ego (...lol) I can see actually applying to Zbergz.

      
m