Quote:
Originally Posted by maxtower
Because you don't want to be the one who profits from an event like this should an investigation occur.
I think the books exclude this possibility because they don't want to be scrutinized if some loony decides to make some money while making an attempt.
Ironically, if there's going to be scrutiny at all, there should also be scrutiny on the ones who bet AGAINST assassination. The way bookies work is that a bet will offer better odds when more bets are accumulated against it. Then a potential "bounty hunter" can just make his bet before carrying out the act. This means that betting against the assassination is akin to paying a hitman for a job. And if he fails to accomplish it, the bettor gets paid for his trouble.
It's not entirely clear what the law has to say about all this, or what it should have to say about it. When you take out a life insurance policy, you're essentially making a bet that you (or someone you know) is gonna die, and that's perfectly legal. When an insurance company offers life insurance, they're making a bet against that person dying, and again it's perfectly legal.
Last edited by alwayscall; 01-31-2017 at 06:43 AM.