Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Legend
It is known as the "forbidden fruit hypothesis". There is a lot of research in regards to this hypothesis and its impact on Sex, Alcohol, and Cigarettes, but there is admittedly less published research on drug use.
I believe this topic is covered in: 2009 Utah L. Rev. 105 (2009)
Predicting the Future: A Bad Reason to Criminalize Drug Use; Husak, Douglas
I am unable to access the whole thing though without paying for it.
Satisfied?
Psychological reactance is the term you're looking for.
Satisfied? No. Because it's anything but definitiveas far as a person's actions. A person may feel psychological reactance, but that does not mean that they will act on it.
The topic is alluded to in the study you mentioned, but they leave out that it's not definitive. From their study:
Quote:
Forecasts about the incidence of drug use after decriminalization are
confounded by yet another phenomenon—the forbidden fruit effect. Many
individuals—most notably adolescents—are known to be attracted to a type of conduct precisely because it is bannedYes. These individuals are more likely to engage in given behaviors that have been proscribedMaybe, certainly not definitive. Although all drug-policy experts acknowledge the importance of the forbidden fruit phenomenon in explaining the prevalence of drug use, its true extent is unknown.28 Still, its role is probably significant.
Probably is ambiguously used in this context. It's easy just to make a blanket statement saying, in a vacuum not accounting for consequence, that they'd partake in the action. Many people would like to do stuff they aren't allowed to, and even though they really want to, they still don't.
I think an infinitely bigger motivating factor is peer pressure.
b